Nested Roller Architectural Shade With Dual Independent Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing architectural opening coverings with separate rollers for supplemental functions or appearances increase size and weight, requiring additional control cords and mechanisms, which complicates operation and aesthetics.

Innovation Solution

A dual roller system where a first shade is wrapped around an outer roller and a second shade is wrapped around an inner roller, both sharing a common axis, with a lock mechanism allowing independent rotation and retraction, enabling a single control mechanism to manage both shades for extended positions and blackout functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate rollers are used for supplemental functions or appearances, then functional versatility is improved, but device complexity and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple roller functions into a single integrated roller assembly. The roller includes both a first shade for light control and a second shade for blackout functionality, both operable from one head rail unit. This merging eliminates the need for separate roller mechanisms, reducing device complexity while maintaining functional versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single roller assembly is designed to perform multiple functions: it can provide light control with the first shade, complete blackout with the second shade, and aesthetic coverage when both shades are extended. This multi-functional design allows one device to replace what would traditionally require separate specialized rollers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate rollers are used for supplemental functions or appearances, then functional versatility is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the second shade and its roller into a single integrated assembly with the first shade, the patent eliminates the weight of separate roller mechanisms, mounting brackets, and control systems. The combined structure uses shared components like a single head rail, common operating mechanisms, and integrated end caps, significantly reducing overall weight while maintaining both light control and blackout functionalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If additional control cords and operating mechanisms are added, then functional versatility is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control systems for both shades into a single operating mechanism within one head rail. A single control cord or motorized system can operate both the first shade for light control and the second shade for blackout, eliminating the complexity of coordinating multiple independent control systems and improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The universal operating mechanism is designed to control multiple shade functions through a single interface. Whether using a pull cord, wand, or motorized system, the user interacts with one control system to achieve different shading effects, maintaining simplicity while providing versatile functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If additional control cords and operating mechanisms are added, then functional versatility is improved, but aesthetics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidaesthetics
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

By combining both shades and their operating mechanisms into a single head rail assembly, the patent creates a clean, unified aesthetic profile. The integrated design eliminates the visual clutter of multiple separate rollers, brackets, and control cords, presenting a sleek single-unit appearance that maintains architectural aesthetics while providing multiple shade functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3333352B1Covering for an architectural opening having nested rollers
Publication Date: 2019.10.16 HUNTER DOUGLAS INC
  • EP3333352B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3333352B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3333352B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A covering for an architectural covering is provided. The covering may include a rotatable outer roller, a rotatable inner roller, a first shade secured to the outer roller, and a second shade secured to the inner roller. The outer roller may define an elongated slot extending along a length of the outer roller and opening to an interior of the outer roller. The inner roller may be received within the outer roller and may define a central longitudinal axis. The first shade may be retractable onto and extendable from the outer roller. The second shade may extend through the elongated slot and may be retractable onto and extendable from the inner roller. The elongated slot may be substantially horizontally aligned with the central longitudinal axis of the inner roller when the first shade is in a fully extended position.