Nested Multi-Element Seal Assembly for Uneven Shaft Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional seal assemblies fail to maintain a fluid-tight seal when the movable shaft or rod ages, as the radially outer face becomes uneven, leading to inconsistencies that the sealing surface cannot conform to.

Innovation Solution

A multiple sealing element assembly with an intermediate sealing element and two end sealing elements, each with complementary surface features and varying hardness values, designed to nest together within a gland groove, ensuring a secure and fluid-tight seal despite surface irregularities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional single sealing element is used, then the structure is simple, but the seal cannot maintain fluid-tightness when the shaft surface becomes uneven due to aging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid-tight sealVSAvoidsealing assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing element is divided into multiple segments (first sealing element, second sealing element, third sealing element) arranged in series along the shaft. Each segment can independently deform to accommodate surface irregularities, with the segmented structure allowing better adaptation to uneven shaft surfaces while maintaining overall sealing effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the sealing assembly have different hardness values - the first sealing element has a first hardness value, the second sealing element has a second hardness value, and the third sealing element has a third hardness value. This local variation in material properties allows each segment to optimally conform to different regions of the shaft surface, improving sealing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the sealing element is made harder to resist deformation under pressure, then structural strength improves, but the ability to conform to uneven shaft surfaces decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to deformation under pressureVSAvoidconformability to uneven surface
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different hardness values to different sealing elements (first hardness value for first sealing element, second hardness value for second sealing element, third hardness value for third sealing element). This creates a gradient structure where softer segments can deform to accommodate surface irregularities while harder segments provide structural support and resistance to pressure, resolving the contradiction between strength and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing assembly uses composite construction with multiple materials of different hardness properties arranged in sequence. This composite approach allows the assembly to exhibit both the conformability of softer materials and the pressure resistance of harder materials, achieving both goals simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3908772B1Multiple component seal assembly
Publication Date: 2024.06.19 CHESTERTON AW CO
  • EP3908772B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3908772B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3908772B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A sealing assembly (30) that includes first, second and third sealing elements, where the first sealing element (40) is disposed between the second and third sealing elements (60, 80). The sealing elements are shaped in a complementary manner so that the sealing elements when assembled nest together. The sealing elements also have different hardness values associated therewith.