Nested Dual-Core Solenoid for Compact Shock Absorber Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solenoids for shock absorbers face challenges in providing sufficient driving force while maintaining a compact size, leading to increased machining costs and potential installation issues, and require additional fail valves that can impair ride quality when the solenoid fails.

Innovation Solution

A solenoid design with two movable iron cores, where the first movable iron core is tubular and slidably inserted into the second movable iron core, and a spring is interposed between the first movable iron core and the first fixed iron core, allowing for sufficient driving force without increasing the axial length, thus maintaining a compact size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a conventional solenoid design is used, then the structure is simple and machining cost is low, but the driving force is insufficient and the axial length must be increased to achieve sufficient force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving forceVSAvoidaxial length
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The solenoid is divided into two separate coil assemblies: a first coil with a first movable iron core, and a second coil with a second movable iron core. Each coil assembly independently generates driving force, allowing the total driving force to be the sum of both assemblies while maintaining a compact axial length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first movable iron core is disposed inside the second movable iron core, creating a nested configuration. This allows both coil assemblies to occupy overlapping spatial volumes, effectively doubling the driving force generation capability within the same axial envelope, thus resolving the contradiction between sufficient driving force and compact size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Force

If the axial length of the solenoid is increased to provide sufficient driving force, then the driving force becomes adequate, but the machining cost increases and installation becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving forceVSAvoidmachining cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the solenoid into two independent coil assemblies that can be manufactured separately and then assembled, the patent avoids the need for a single large, complex solenoid structure. This segmentation allows each assembly to be manufactured using standard processes, reducing overall machining costs while achieving sufficient driving force through the combined output of both assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The nested configuration of the first movable iron core within the second movable iron core allows both coil assemblies to share the same axial space. This eliminates the need to increase axial length to achieve sufficient driving force, thereby avoiding increased machining costs and installation difficulties associated with longer components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If a fail valve is added in parallel with the solenoid valve, then the damping force can be controlled at the time of failure, but the fail valve may open in normal times and back pressure cannot be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure controlVSAvoidnormal control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The solenoid's two coil assemblies continuously generate driving force during normal operation, with the first coil assembly providing sufficient force to keep the fail valve closed without requiring a separate fail valve mechanism. The system serves its own fail-safe function through the redundant coil configuration, eliminating the need for an additional fail valve that would compromise normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solenoid achieves sufficient driving force at a lower cost without enlarging the solenoid, enabling efficient control of damping force in shock absorbers without increasing size, eliminating the need for additional fail valves and optimizing ride quality.

Implementation Method 1

a coil, a first fixed iron core disposed on an axial first-end side of the coil, a second fixed iron core disposed on an axial second-end side of the coil with a gap from the first fixed iron core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a first movable iron core disposed between the first fixed iron core and the second fixed iron core and attracted to the first fixed iron core by passing a current through the coil, a second movable iron core disposed between the first fixed iron core and the second fixed iron core and attracted to the second fixed iron core by passing a current through the coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

a spring interposed between the first movable iron core and the first fixed iron core and pressing the first movable iron core to the second fixed iron core side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12597546B2Solenoid, solenoid valve, and shock absorber
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 KYB CORP
  • US12597546B2 patent drawing
  • US12597546B2 patent drawing
  • US12597546B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A solenoid includes: a coil; a first fixed iron core disposed on an axial first-end side of the coil; a second fixed iron core disposed on an axial second-end side of the coil with a gap from the first fixed iron core; a tubular first movable iron core disposed between the first fixed iron core and the second fixed iron core: a second movable iron core having a tubular shape with a bottom, slidably inserted into the first movable iron core, disposed between the first fixed iron core and the second fixed iron core with a bottom portion facing the second fixed iron core; and a spring interposed between the first movable iron core and the first fixed iron core, and pressing the first movable iron core to the second fixed iron core side.