Automatic Nesting Locking Sections to Reduce Manual Editing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automatic nesting systems require significant manual intervention and labor for optimizing part layouts on multiple sheets, leading to increased data preparation time and errors.

Innovation Solution

An automatic programming device that includes a storage means, input means, and control means to acquire nested workpiece information, lock sections that require no re-nesting, conduct re-nesting on other sections, and prepare a nesting machining program, with the ability to set priority orders for re-nesting processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic nesting is used to arrange parts on sheets, then nesting efficiency is improved, but manual editing labor increases when optimization is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenesting efficiencyVSAvoidmanual editing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sheet into multiple sections and allows selective locking of specific sections that require no re-nesting. This segmentation enables the operator to lock only the critical high-yield sections while allowing automatic re-nesting in other sections, thereby reducing manual editing time while maintaining nesting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a locking mechanism that allows operators to pre-lock sections before the re-nesting process. By performing this preliminary action of identifying and locking critical sections in advance, the system avoids the need for manual editing after automatic nesting, thus reducing manual editing time while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If manual rearrangement of parts is conducted to achieve high-yield layout, then layout optimization is improved, but data preparation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout optimizationVSAvoiddata preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to perform self-service by automatically re-nesting parts in unlocked sections after the initial automatic nesting. This automatic adjustment maintains layout optimization without requiring manual intervention, thereby reducing data preparation time while preserving manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the operator about the nesting results and allows selective locking of sections. This feedback mechanism enables the operator to identify critical sections that require manual optimization, and the system automatically handles the remaining sections, thus reducing overall data preparation time while maintaining layout quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If entire sheet editing is required for optimization, then layout flexibility is improved, but operator labor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout flexibilityVSAvoidoperator labor
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sheet into lockable sections, allowing the operator to maintain layout flexibility in unlocked sections through automatic re-nesting while reducing operator labor by locking critical sections. This segmentation approach provides adaptability without requiring entire sheet editing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different qualities to different sections of the sheet: locked sections maintain their original layout quality while unlocked sections allow automatic re-nesting. This local differentiation provides layout flexibility where needed while minimizing operator labor in critical sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If re-nesting is conducted on all sections, then nesting optimization is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenesting optimizationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the re-nesting process by allowing selective locking of sections. Only unlocked sections undergo re-nesting, which maintains nesting optimization in critical areas while reducing overall processing time by excluding locked sections from the re-nesting operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by conducting re-nesting only on unlocked sections rather than all sections. This partial re-nesting maintains sufficient nesting optimization in critical areas while significantly reducing processing time compared to complete re-nesting of the entire sheet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10152045B2Automatic programming device and method therefor
Publication Date: 2018.12.11 AMADA HOLDINGS CO LTD
  • US10152045B2 patent drawing
  • US10152045B2 patent drawing
  • US10152045B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a machining system that conducts nesting to arrange parts over a workpiece and machines the workpiece with a machine tool according to a result of the nesting, there is an automatic programming device for preparing a nesting machining program for the machine tool, wherein nested workpiece information relating to the workpiece nested is acquired according to the information relating to the parts and the information relating to the workpiece, sections that require no re-nesting in the nested workpiece information are locked according to the operator's designation, re-nesting is conducted on sections other than the locked sections.