Nesting Roll Container with Pivotable Base and Side Walls

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing roll containers, particularly the A-frame and V-frame types, face challenges in handling empty nesting units, requiring improved stability and ergonomic handling during transportation.

Innovation Solution

A novel roll container design featuring a rear section with pivotably attached side walls and a chassis, along with a base that can be lifted from the chassis in a nesting state, utilizing a foot-operated locking mechanism for securing side walls and a secondary locking mechanism to enhance stability and ergonomics, allowing for efficient queuing and forklift transportation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the base is pivotably attached to the rear section to enable nesting, then the nesting ability is improved, but the stability during transportation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenesting abilityVSAvoidstability during transportation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The base is designed to be pivotably attached to the rear section, enabling it to dynamically change position between a horizontal deployed state for stable transportation and a vertical nesting state for compact storage. This dynamic mechanism allows the same structure to satisfy both stability requirements during transport and nesting requirements for storage efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The base's orientation parameter is changed between two discrete states: horizontal (0 degrees) for stable transportation and vertical (90 degrees) for nesting. This parameter change enables the roll container to transition between functional modes, resolving the contradiction between stability and nesting ability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the side walls are made extendable for nesting, then the nesting efficiency is improved, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenesting efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The side walls are made pivotable rather than fixed, allowing them to dynamically adjust their position. In the deployed state, they extend parallel to each other for stability; in the nesting state, they fold outward to enable compact stacking. This dynamic design achieves nesting efficiency without requiring complex disassembly mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If the locking mechanism is added to secure the base, then the stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase stabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be automatically engaged when the base is in the horizontal deployed state, providing stable fixation without requiring manual intervention. The mechanism self-activates through the natural positioning of the base, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high stability during transportation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If four swivel castors are used for mobility, then the ease of operation is improved, but the stability deteriorates due to higher center of gravity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemobilityVSAvoidcenter of gravity stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The base's ability to pivot between horizontal and vertical positions dynamically adjusts the center of gravity. In the deployed horizontal state, the base extends the footprint and lowers the effective center of gravity, providing stability when four swivel castors are used for enhanced mobility. This dynamic configuration allows the system to achieve both ease of operation and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3581462B1Roll container
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 K HARTWALL OY AB
  • EP3581462B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3581462B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP3581462B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A novel roll container (100) of a nesting type is proposed with a rear section (110) and two side walls (140) which laterally oppose one another and which are pivotably attached to the rear section (110) between a parallel deployed state and a non-parallel nesting state. The roll container also has a chassis (120), which is attached to the rear section (110), and a base (130) which is pivotably attached to the rear section (110) such to be pivotable between a deployed state on the chassis (120) and a nesting state off the chassis (120). The roll container further has a locking mechanism (150) for releasably securing one of the two side walls (140) to the base (130) or chassis (120).