Flexible Net Shield with Angled Rods for RPG Dud

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing countermeasures against rocket propelled grenades (RPGs) are ineffective, expensive, complex, and unreliable, and static armor systems are heavy, difficult to install, and do not prevent detonation, while current lightweight solutions like chain link fencing are insufficient in preventing RPG penetration.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, flexible net shield system with interconnected rods and nodes, featuring hard points and a compliant net design that prevents detonation by angling inwardly to dud the RPG, easily attachable and removable from vehicles or structures, using hook and loop fasteners and telescoping frames for adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static armor is added to protect against RPGs, then protection effectiveness is improved, but vehicle weight increases and maneuverability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The armor system is divided into modular panels that can be selectively installed on different vehicle zones. Each panel is a self-contained unit with standardized mounting interfaces, allowing partial coverage rather than full vehicle encasement, thus reducing overall weight while maintaining protection in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The armor system incorporates movable and adjustable components that can be repositioned or removed based on operational requirements. This dynamic configuration allows the vehicle to optimize between protection and maneuverability depending on the mission profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If bar/slat armor is installed to prevent RPG detonation, then protection against shaped charge is improved, but installation complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRPG detonation preventionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bar/slat armor is divided into discrete, pre-fabricated panels with standardized dimensions and mounting features. Each panel can be independently installed using simple fastening mechanisms, dramatically reducing installation complexity and time compared to custom-fitted bar/slat systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The armor panels utilize standardized mounting parameters and interface specifications that simplify the installation process. Consistent hole patterns, universal fasteners, and modular dimensions transform a complex custom installation into a routine assembly task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If chain link fence shield is added to reduce weight, then vehicle weight is reduced, but protection effectiveness against RPG penetration deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle weightVSAvoidRPG penetration prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shield system combines multiple materials with complementary properties: lightweight aluminum or composite panels for the basic structure, supplemented by ceramic tiles or metal mesh for enhanced ballistic resistance. This composite approach achieves RPG protection levels without the weight penalty of solid steel armor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than uniformly thick armor across the entire vehicle, the system applies enhanced protective materials only in areas most vulnerable to RPG impacts (front, sides, engine compartment), using lighter materials elsewhere. This localized protection strategy optimizes the weight-protection ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If heavily armored vehicle is deployed to resist RPG attacks, then protection effectiveness is improved, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The armor system is implemented as selective modular panels rather than complete vehicle encasement, reducing total armor mass and consequently the energy required to move the vehicle. Critical zones receive protection while non-critical areas remain lightweight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The armor thickness and material density are optimized to provide adequate protection against typical RPG threats while minimizing weight. This parameter optimization balances protection effectiveness with acceptable fuel consumption levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2662657B1Shield for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.08.02 FOSTER MILLER INC
  • EP2662657B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2662657B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2662657B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A shield for a vehicle comprising: ∙ a flexible compliant net subsystem (10) with strands designed to break if struck by a projectile; ∙ an array of rods (12) on the net subsystem (10), the rods (12) designed and attached to the net subsystem (10) in such a manner that the rods (12) impact an ogive of a projectile striking the shield; ∙ a frame (16) including mounting brackets (18a-18d) attached thereto positioning the frame (16) in a spaced relationship with respect to a vehicle or structure; and ∙ the net subsystem (10) being secured to the frame (16).