Physically Secured Network Access Control Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network protocols lack robust authentication and security measures, making it difficult for organizations to protect their online resources from malicious actors, insider attacks, and rogue software entities, especially in heterogeneous environments and multi-cloud setups.

Innovation Solution

A network security system with a physically secured access control device that includes a barrier surrounding an enclosure for a private computer network, allowing authorized access while preventing unauthorized access from both external and internal threats, using a container and firewall device to control traffic and detect breaches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If network protocols allow open communication like the Internet, then ease of operation and connectivity are improved, but security and authentication are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconnectivityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The network is divided into multiple enclaves (first enclave, second enclave, third enclave) separated by firewalls. Each enclave can have different security policies and access controls, allowing open communication within enclaves while maintaining security between them. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling both connectivity within segments and security between segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Firewall devices act as intermediaries between enclaves, controlling and filtering traffic. The firewall device includes a processor that evaluates packets against security policies and determines whether to allow or block communication. This intermediary mechanism enables open communication while maintaining security through controlled mediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If firewalls are configured to enable legitimate communication outside enclave, then adaptability is improved, but security is worsened due to potential exploitation holes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication flexibilityVSAvoidsecurity vulnerabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different security policies are applied to different enclaves and different types of traffic. The firewall device can apply specific access control rules, packet filtering policies, and security measures tailored to each enclave's requirements. This local quality approach allows flexible communication where needed while maintaining strong security where required, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If access is provided to technicians and administrators for maintenance, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened due to potential bypass attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance accessVSAvoidsecurity integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Security measures are implemented in advance to prevent bypass attacks. The firewall device is physically secured within enclaves, and security policies are pre-configured to identify and block potential bypass attempts. Motion sensors and alarm systems are installed beforehand to detect and respond to unauthorized access attempts. This preliminary action approach maintains ease of operation for authorized personnel while preventing security breaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If physical security measures are added to protect access control devices, then security is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical securityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The firewall device is nested within a secured enclave, which itself is nested within the larger network infrastructure. The enclave contains the firewall device and associated security components (motion sensors, alarms) in a compact, integrated structure. This nesting approach provides robust physical security while maintaining relatively simple system architecture by organizing components hierarchically rather than adding separate complex systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS20240422126A1Physically secured network access control devices and systems
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 APPLIED INVENTION LLC
  • US20240422126A1 patent drawing
  • US20240422126A1 patent drawing
  • US20240422126A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network security system includes a barrier surrounding an enclosure. The enclosure contains a first network and a first networked device connected to the first network. The barrier prevents the first network from breaching the enclosure and permits a second network to penetrate a first portion of the barrier. A container located within the enclosure mounts to the first portion of the barrier, such that a second portion of the container superposes the first portion of the barrier. The container permits the first network and the second network to enter the container. The container prevents the second network from breaching the container and entering a third portion of the enclosure located outside the container. A firewall device located within the container controls network traffic between the first networked device and a second networked device connected to the second network.