Dynamic Network Authority Segmentation for Conflict Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing networking devices often assume authority over networks, leading to conflicts and preventing multiple devices from independently serving end-users, especially in environments where manual configuration is not viable.

Innovation Solution

Methods and systems for dynamically configuring networking devices to adapt to network conditions and resolve conflicts, allowing multiple devices to provide different or similar services while avoiding overlap and provisioning issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple networking devices are deployed to serve end-users independently, then service coverage and functionality are improved, but conflicts and authority overlaps occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidconflict resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments network authority by allowing different networking devices to assume authoritative roles for different services or network segments. Each device can be configured to provide specific services (e.g., DHCP, routing, security) independently, dividing the overall network management function into manageable segments that reduce conflicts while expanding coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically assigns and reassigns authoritative roles to networking devices based on current network conditions, device capabilities, and service requirements. This dynamic authority assignment allows the network to adapt to changing topologies and service demands, resolving conflicts through real-time reconfiguration rather than static hierarchical control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If manual configuration is used to set up networking devices, then control over device behavior is improved, but complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration controlVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Networking devices automatically configure themselves by discovering available services and resources on the network, selecting appropriate roles, and self-adjusting their parameters without manual intervention. The system enables devices to autonomously negotiate their authority and functionality based on pre-defined policies and network conditions, eliminating time-consuming manual setup while maintaining operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically modifies device parameters such as IP addresses, service configurations, and authority assignments based on real-time network conditions and device capabilities. Rather than requiring manual parameter entry, the system dynamically adjusts these parameters through automated negotiation protocols, reducing configuration time while optimizing device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If networking devices assume authority for the entire network, then service provision capability is improved, but conflicts between devices occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice provision capabilityVSAvoiddevice conflicts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of all devices claiming universal authority, the patent implements local quality by allowing each networking device to assume authority only for specific services, locations, or user groups where it is most appropriate. This differentiated authority model enables devices to provide services locally without interfering with other devices' domains, reducing conflicts while maintaining overall service capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary mechanisms such as coordination protocols and negotiation frameworks that mediate between competing devices. These intermediaries facilitate smooth authority transitions and service coordination, allowing devices to operate independently while preventing harmful conflicts through structured interaction protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250211481A1Dynamic network awareness
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 ADEIA MEDIA HOLDINGS INC
  • US20250211481A1 patent drawing
  • US20250211481A1 patent drawing
  • US20250211481A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for managing a network are disclosed. One method can comprise determining presence of a first network device associated with a network. If the first network device is not present, a second network device can be configured to assume authority of the network. If the first network device is present, the second network device can be configured to join the network. Other aspects relate to providing services in an environment having multiple service providers.