Network Connection Management via Dynamic Band Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dual-band wireless networks, particularly those operating at 5 GHz, face reliability issues due to channel overlap with radar systems, leading to decreased performance when multiple devices switch channels simultaneously, resulting in crowded and less reliable connections.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for managing network connections by switching between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands based on network activity monitoring, generating profiles for each band, and selecting the more reliable connection, allowing devices to switch back and forth between these bands while idle to optimize performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If dual-band wireless access points are introduced to address network crowding, then network capacity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to radar interference and channel switching issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidconnection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically monitors network conditions including signal strength, interference levels, and channel availability, then adapts connection parameters in real-time. The access point and client devices continuously adjust their operating parameters based on monitored conditions, transforming the static dual-band system into a dynamic one that can respond to changing environmental factors and avoid radar interference zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where network activity is monitored and used to generate profiles for different frequency bands. The system compares these profiles and uses the comparison results to select optimal connections, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously improves reliability based on observed performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic frequency selection is implemented to avoid radar interference, then frequency compatibility is improved, but network reliability deteriorates when multiple devices switch channels simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency compatibilityVSAvoidnetwork reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of network conditions and generates connection profiles before actual data transmission begins. By pre-assessing channel quality, signal strength, and interference levels, the system can select optimal frequencies in advance, avoiding the need for simultaneous mid-transmission channel switches that cause reliability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the network monitoring and selection process into distinct phases: monitoring network activity, generating profiles for different bands, comparing profiles, and selecting connections. This segmentation allows devices to make independent, coordinated decisions about channel switching rather than forcing simultaneous switches across all devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11095406B2Methods, systems, and media for managing network connections
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11095406B2 patent drawing
  • US11095406B2 patent drawing
  • US11095406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and media for controlling network connections are provided. In some implementations, a method for controlling network connections is provided, the method comprising: determining, by a user device connection to an access point by a first network connection, that a second network connection is available; determining that the user device is in an idle state; while the user device is in the idle state, switching from the first network connection to the second network connection; monitoring network activity using the second network connection; switching back to the first network connection; generating a profile for the second network connection based at least in part on the monitored network activity; comparing the profile for the second network connection to a profile for the first network connection; selecting the second network connection based on the comparison; and in response to selecting the second network connection, switching to the second network connection.