Network Resource Brokering via Dynamic Bidding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current charging schemes in communication networks fail to adequately monetize the value of network infrastructure investments, particularly in next-generation mobile and fixed networks, as they do not efficiently utilize dynamic network resources and do not incentivize OTT players to contribute to financing.

Innovation Solution

A network resources brokering system that dynamically allocates resources based on bids, allowing for preferential treatment and charging, where bidders compete for chargeable consumption units during defined charging periods, enabling efficient utilization and monetization of network resources through a bidding process that interworks with enforcement functions for real-time charging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If current charging schemes are used, then network operators can maintain existing billing structures, but they fail to adequately monetize the value of network infrastructure investments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue loss from network investmentsVSAvoidadaptability of charging schemes
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic charging periods that can be adjusted based on network conditions, resource availability, and bid values. The charging system transitions from static to dynamic operation, allowing operators to optimize revenue by adapting charging parameters in real-time according to network utilization and investment requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes charging parameters including charging period duration, pricing multipliers, and threshold values based on network conditions and investment priorities. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system maximizes revenue generation from network infrastructure while maintaining operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If network resources are dynamically provided in next generation networks, then resource allocation flexibility improves, but efficient utilization and monetization become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic resource allocationVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the brokering entity receives information about network resource usage, charging period performance, and bid outcomes. This feedback is used to adjust future charging periods and resource allocation decisions, creating a closed-loop system that continuously optimizes both utilization efficiency and revenue generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing charging periods and bid opportunities in advance of actual resource consumption. This allows the network to proactively allocate resources and set pricing strategies before demand occurs, ensuring efficient utilization while capturing maximum value from dynamic resource provision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10250754B2Network resources brokering system and enforcement function network entity
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
  • US10250754B2 patent drawing
  • US10250754B2 patent drawing
  • US10250754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a network resources brokering system, comprising: a communication network with at least one enforcement function for preferential treatment and charging; and a brokering entity, configured to receive requests from a plurality of network entities for providing preferential treatment during usage of chargeable resources within a predefined charging period, each request comprising an electronic bid value competing with other network entities for preferential treatment during the usage of chargeable resources in the charging period, wherein the brokering entity is configured to rank each network entity from the plurality of network entities into one of a multiplicity of success classes based upon their electronic bid values offered and to interwork with the at least one enforcement function for preferential treatment and charging.