Root Cause Detection via Network Causal Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional root cause analysis in large networks is inefficient and prone to false alarms, as it often relies on detecting the first or last error event, which may not be severe or temporary, and is difficult to trace code paths to understand failures effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system that correlates alerts across the network based on causal relationships and metadata, using machine learning to identify the probable root cause of anomalous events and generate incident tickets for the responsible entities, while avoiding false positives by recognizing non-causal relationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional root cause analysis is performed by detecting the first or last error event, then the analysis process is simple, but the precision and reliability of root cause identification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of analysis processVSAvoidprecision of root cause identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into multiple hierarchical levels (core network, access network, end devices) and analyzes errors at each level separately. This segmentation allows the system to identify root causes more precisely by examining dependencies between levels rather than treating the network as a monolithic system, thus resolving the contradiction between simple analysis and precise identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis mechanism that correlates errors across different network levels and identifies causal relationships. This intermediary layer processes the complexity of multi-level dependencies and presents simplified root cause information, enabling both easy operation and high precision in root cause identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If traditional error detection methods are used, then the system complexity is low, but the time required to trace code paths and understand failures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidtime to trace code paths
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing dependency relationships between network components at different levels. This preliminary mapping of dependencies allows the system to quickly trace failure paths during actual error detection without performing complex real-time analysis, thus reducing time loss while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual code path tracing with automated correlation algorithms that process error information across network levels. This substitution of mechanical manual tracing with automated computational methods significantly reduces the time required to understand failures while keeping the overall system complexity manageable through structured algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If alerts are correlated based on temporal proximity only, then the correlation process is simple, but false alarms increase due to non-causal relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of correlation processVSAvoidaccuracy of root cause identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the correlation parameters from temporal proximity alone to a multi-parameter approach including temporal relationships, dependency relationships between network components, and causal analysis. This parameter transformation enables the system to distinguish between correlated and causally related events, reducing false alarms while maintaining operational simplicity through automated multi-parameter evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240356795A1Root cause detection of anomalous behavior using network relationships and event correlation
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US20240356795A1 patent drawing
  • US20240356795A1 patent drawing
  • US20240356795A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes systems, devices, and techniques for determining a root cause of anomalous events in a networked computing environment. A node detects an alert corresponding to an anomalous event during a time period. The alert is correlated with previously detected alerts occurring within the time period and a causal relationship associated with nodes in the networked computing environment. The node may then recursively identify a root cause of the anomalous event detected in the networked computing environment based on a set of correlated alerts. An incident ticket may then be sent to the node identified as the root cause of the anomalous event, and the node may notify other nodes in the network having a causal relationship with the node of the anomalous event.