Network Configuration Changes Using Multi-Timescale Cost Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network optimization methods often result in inefficiencies due to the addition of spare capacity based on worst-case scenarios, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and delayed responses to traffic anomalies, which can disrupt network performance and increase operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A cost-of-change analysis framework that considers the impact and duration of network changes across multiple time scales, allowing for proactive and efficient resource allocation and traffic steering to address stress conditions without over-sizing capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If spare capacity is added based on worst-case scenarios, then network resiliency is improved, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resiliencyVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of capacity planning from static worst-case sizing to dynamic allocation based on probabilistic stress scenarios. By modeling stress occurrence probabilities and durations, the system determines optimal spare capacity levels that balance resiliency requirements with resource efficiency, avoiding both over-provisioning and under-provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic traffic steering capabilities that can rapidly redirect traffic around stressed network components in real-time. This dynamic response mechanism allows the network to handle stress conditions adaptively without requiring excessive static spare capacity, thereby improving resource allocation efficiency while maintaining resiliency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If rapid network routing changes are enacted to respond to traffic anomalies, then response speed is improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-computes and stores optimal routing paths for various stress scenarios before they occur. When a stress condition is detected, the system can immediately enact pre-planned routing changes without performing complex real-time calculations, thereby achieving rapid response while keeping operational complexity manageable through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous monitoring of network stress conditions with automated feedback loops that trigger routing changes when thresholds are exceeded. This closed-loop control system automatically detects stress, evaluates the need for rerouting, and enacts changes without human intervention, reducing operational complexity while maintaining fast response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250286780A1Apparatuses and methods for facilitating modifications in networks and systems, accounting for the cost of enacting change across multiple time scales
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 CIENA CORP
  • US20250286780A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286780A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286780A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, obtaining parametric data, analyzing the parametric data to identify a non-ideality with respect to a configuration of a network, performing, based on the analyzing of the parametric data, a cost-of-change analysis to identify whether one or more changes to the configuration of the network are warranted, and based on the performing of the cost-of-change analysis indicating that at least one change of the one or more changes is warranted, modifying the configuration of the network, the modifying resulting in a modified configuration of the network that is different from the configuration of the network. Other embodiments are disclosed.