Network Change Risk Scoring and Countermeasure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprises face challenges in detecting and analyzing operational risk in network environments, particularly when implementing changes to network applications, which can lead to potential failures and outages due to unassessed logistical, technological, and personnel risks.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize an operational risk module to calculate a change risk score, incorporating service tier, time, security, and mobile device risk scores, and implementing countermeasures if the score reaches a high-risk level, to preemptively manage and mitigate potential operational failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If changes are made to network applications to improve functionality and service, then productivity and adaptability are improved, but operational risk and potential network failures increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork application functionalityVSAvoidnetwork operational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment and simulation before implementing changes to network applications. It calculates change risk scores based on multiple factors (service tier, time, day, security, mobile device) and simulates potential impacts on network devices before the actual change is deployed, allowing preventive measures to be taken in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by monitoring network device performance metrics before, during, and after changes are implemented. The feedback mechanism includes real-time monitoring of transaction volumes, error rates, and other performance indicators that trigger alerts or countermeasures when thresholds are breached

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive risk assessment is performed to improve reliability, then operational risk is reduced, but time consumption and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational risk mitigationVSAvoidchange implementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment process is segmented into multiple independent components: service tier analysis, time-based risk evaluation, day-of-week analysis, security risk assessment, and mobile device risk evaluation. Each component can be processed independently and contributes to the overall change risk score, enabling parallel processing and reducing total assessment time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses predefined risk thresholds and scoring parameters to rapidly evaluate changes. By transforming complex risk assessment into quantitative parameter comparisons (risk scores against thresholds), the system enables fast automated decisions without requiring complex manual analysis for each change

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If monitoring and simulation of network changes are implemented to prevent failures, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork failure preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment system serves multiple functions: it evaluates change requests, simulates network impacts, monitors real-time performance, triggers alerts, and implements countermeasures. By consolidating these functions into a single integrated platform, the system avoids the complexity of multiple separate tools and processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-monitoring and self-diagnosis by automatically collecting performance metrics from network devices, analyzing them against predefined thresholds, and triggering appropriate responses without requiring continuous human intervention. This automation reduces the operational complexity of maintaining the monitoring system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9787709B2Detecting and analyzing operational risk in a network environment
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US9787709B2 patent drawing
  • US9787709B2 patent drawing
  • US9787709B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a system for the realization of operational risk in a network includes an interface to receive a change request to update a network application, the network application utilizes a network device. The system may then use a processor communicatively coupled to the interface to generate a change risk score associated with the change request, wherein the change risk score includes a service tier risk score, a time risk score, a day risk score, a security risk score, and a mobile device risk score. The processor may determine whether the change risk score is within a high-risk level, and if so, implement a change counter measure.