Network Configuration Comparison Screen for Industrial Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In factory automation, manual identification and modification of network configuration changes between the designed and actual machine configurations in industrial network systems are labor-intensive and prone to errors, requiring a more efficient method for comparison and reflection of these changes.

Innovation Solution

A design assistance device that automatically compares designed and actual network configurations, generating a comparison screen to highlight commonalities and differences, allowing users to quickly identify and modify design information to align with actual machine configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual identification and modification of network configuration changes is performed, then configuration accuracy can be maintained, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidlabor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis by automatically collecting actual configuration information from the network system and comparing it with design information, eliminating the need for manual identification and modification of configuration changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with an automated information processing system that collects, compares, and presents configuration differences through a comparison screen, significantly reducing labor intensity while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual modification of design information is performed, then configuration changes can be tracked, but time consumption and human error increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration tracking reliabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by automatically comparing actual configuration information with design information and presenting differences on a comparison screen, enabling rapid identification and modification of configuration changes without manual tracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary comparison of configuration information before modification is needed, pre-identifying differences between design and actual configurations to streamline the subsequent modification process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed comparison of network configurations is performed manually, then configuration differences can be identified, but operator workload and potential for errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration difference identification accuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a comparison screen as an intermediary that automatically presents configuration differences between design and actual network systems, eliminating the need for operators to manually compare detailed configurations while maintaining identification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9596124B2Assistance device of network system
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 OMRON CORP
  • US9596124B2 patent drawing
  • US9596124B2 patent drawing
  • US9596124B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A design assistance device includes: a design information storage section configured to store design information containing at least information of slave devices and information of a topology in a network system in accordance with a design created by a user; an actual configuration information generation section configured to generate actual configuration information containing at least the information of the slave devices and the information of the topology in the actual network system; a comparison section configured to compare the design information and the actual configuration information; and an output section configured to generate a comparison screen indicating the respective configurations of the designed network system and the actual network system along with their commonalities and differences and outputting the comparison screen to a display device. Thus, a technology can be provided which assists the user to easily compare the designed network configuration and the actual machine's network configuration.