Automated Network Configuration System for Hardware Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual configuration of network environments by system administrators is prone to errors, leading to inefficiencies, data processing issues, and bottlenecks due to improper software, firmware installations, and misconfiguration of components.

Innovation Solution

A computer program product and method that determines the configuration, usage level, and functional category of networked hardware components, outputting a suggested configuration and automatically configuring components based on these determinations to ensure proper firmware, software, and parameter installation across similar components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual configuration by system administrator is used, then flexibility and control are maintained, but errors and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically detecting components, determining their types, and applying appropriate configuration parameters without requiring manual administrator intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously managing the configuration process, which eliminates human errors while maintaining configuration accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of administrator configuration is replaced with an automated electronic system that uses component detection, type determination, and automatic parameter application. This substitution eliminates the need for human operators while improving both reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If automated configuration is implemented, then configuration accuracy and consistency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The configuration system is segmented into distinct functional modules: component detection module, type determination module, and configuration application module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the configuration process, making the overall system more manageable and less complex while maintaining high consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated configuration system is designed to handle multiple component types and configuration scenarios through a universal framework. By creating a multi-functional system that can adapt to different component types automatically, the complexity is distributed and managed systematically rather than requiring separate manual procedures for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If additional components are added to network environment, then functionality and capacity increase, but configuration errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork expandabilityVSAvoidconfiguration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and type determination of components before configuration is applied. By detecting components and determining their types in advance, the system ensures that correct configuration parameters are applied from the outset, preventing configuration errors even as the network expands with additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the network environment for new components and automatically detects them. When additional components are added to the network, the system receives feedback about their presence, determines their types, and applies appropriate configurations automatically, maintaining reliability during network expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11088910B2Efficient method for managing and adding systems within a solution
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 LENOVO GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US11088910B2 patent drawing
  • US11088910B2 patent drawing
  • US11088910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes: determining a configuration of one or more networked hardware components; determining a usage level associated with one or more of the networked hardware components; determining a functional category of one or more of the networked hardware components based at least in part on the configuration of the one or more networked hardware components and the usage level associated with the one or more networked hardware components; and one or more of: outputting a suggested configuration of one or more of the networked hardware components based on the determined functional category of the one or more networked hardware components; and configuring of one or more of the networked hardware components based on the determined functional category of the one or more networked hardware components. Corresponding systems and computer program products are also disclosed.