Network Control System Direct Peer-to-Peer Data Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing plant control systems face increased costs and complexity due to hierarchical network architectures, resulting in higher maintenance expenses, reduced data transfer rates, suboptimal data transfer, mismatched memory addresses, and complicated engineering tasks.

Innovation Solution

A network control system with global and local shared memory areas allows direct data transfer between networks without a superordinate network, optimizing data transfer periods and addresses for efficient communication and reduced costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a hierarchical network architecture with superordinate networks is used to connect multiple sub-networks, then data transfer between sub-networks can be implemented, but the system configuration complexity increases and fabrication cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer capabilityVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the superordinate network N110 and data transfer systems DT104-DT106 into a direct peer-to-peer connection between sub-networks N101-N103. Each sub-network station (STN111-STN13n) can directly access shared memories in other sub-networks without intermediate transfer systems, eliminating hierarchical complexity while maintaining data transfer capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the superordinate network N110 and data transfer systems DT104-DT106 from the system architecture. By eliminating these intermediate components, the system achieves direct communication between sub-networks, reducing configuration complexity and fabrication cost while preserving essential data transfer functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If data transfer through superordinate network and additional data transfer systems is used, then data can be transferred between sub-networks, but the data transfer rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer capabilityVSAvoiddata transfer rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the superordinate network N110 and data transfer systems DT104-DT106 that caused data transfer delays. By establishing direct connections between sub-network stations, data can be transferred without intermediate routing steps, significantly increasing the data transfer rate while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If multiple data transfer systems and superordinate networks are provisioned, then data transfer between sub-networks is enabled, but fabrication cost increases and maintenance cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer capabilityVSAvoidfabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the superordinate network N110 and data transfer systems DT104-DT106, reducing the number of hardware components that need to be manufactured and installed. This directly reduces fabrication cost while maintaining data transfer capability through direct peer-to-peer connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of superordinate network N110 and data transfer systems DT104-DT106 into direct communication paths between sub-network stations. By combining these separate components into integrated direct connections, the system reduces both fabrication cost and maintenance cost while preserving data transfer functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If hierarchical network architecture with multiple components is used, then data transfer between sub-networks can be implemented, but maintenance expense increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance expense
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the superordinate network N110 and data transfer systems DT104-DT106, eliminating the components that require maintenance. By reducing the total number of system components, maintenance expense is directly reduced while data transfer capability is maintained through simplified direct connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9037652B2Network control system
Publication Date: 2015.05.19 TMEIC CORP
  • US9037652B2 patent drawing
  • US9037652B2 patent drawing
  • US9037652B2 patent drawing

AI summary

First and second stations have first and second memory elements (2, 3) for storing first and second shared data, respectively, and a data transfer system (DT1) includes third and fourth memory elements (CM 12, CM 14) for storing third and fourth shared data, respectively, first and second transfer period determiner (CNT 90, CNT 92), a first transfer element (26a) working to operate in accordance with the first transfer period to have the second shared data stored in the fourth memory element (CM 14) and operate in accordance with the second transfer period to have the first shared data stored in the third memory element (CM 12), a second transfer element (26b) working for transfer of shared data between the fourth memory element (CM 14) and the third memory element (CM 12), and a third transfer element (26c) working to operate in accordance with the second transfer period to have the fourth shared data stored in the second memory element (3) and operate in accordance with the first transfer period to have the third shared data stored in the first memory element (2).