Network Coverage Validation System for Real-Time Installation Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for verifying network coverage of newly installed devices are not capable of providing real-time feedback, leading to costly return visits and inefficiencies in installation processes.

Innovation Solution

A network coverage validation system that allows installers to confirm communicative operability of newly installed end devices in real-time using a network reading device, which initiates a validation message and receives a response, while minimizing impact on normal network operations and requiring minimal user interaction, and includes GPS functionality for location logging and data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pre-install propagation modeling and post-install review of system performance data are used, then network coverage can be analyzed, but real-time feedback is not provided to installers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverage validationVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary propagation modeling and coverage analysis before the actual installation is completed. By pre-calculating expected coverage areas and signal strengths, the system prepares validation criteria in advance, enabling rapid real-time verification once the device is installed, thus avoiding time-consuming post-install analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where coverage validation results are immediately communicated back to the installer during the installation process. The network device transmits test signals and the system analyzes the responses to provide real-time coverage confirmation, allowing installers to address issues on-site rather than during follow-up visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If post-install review of system performance data is conducted hours, days, or weeks after installation, then coverage issues can be identified, but costly return visits are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage measurementVSAvoidinstallation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary propagation modeling and coverage analysis before the actual installation is completed. By pre-calculating expected coverage areas and signal strengths, the system prepares validation criteria in advance, enabling rapid real-time verification once the device is installed, thus avoiding time-consuming post-install analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where coverage validation results are immediately communicated back to the installer during the installation process. The network device transmits test signals and the system analyzes the responses to provide real-time coverage confirmation, allowing installers to address issues on-site rather than during follow-up visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If real-time validation is implemented, then installer feedback is immediate, but network operations may be impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation timeVSAvoidnetwork operation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial validation by selecting specific test signals and frequency channels for coverage verification rather than comprehensively testing all network parameters. This selective approach provides sufficient validation information to installers while minimizing the disruption to normal network operations and data traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process is implemented periodically rather than continuously, with test signals transmitted at scheduled intervals. This periodic approach allows real-time validation capability while ensuring normal network operations are not constantly disrupted, balancing verification needs with operational stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8781462B2Methodology and apparatus for validating network coverage
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 ITRON INC
  • US8781462B2 patent drawing
  • US8781462B2 patent drawing
  • US8781462B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are apparatus and methodology for validating network coverage (i.e., desired functionality) of newly installed network devices. Per use of presently disclosed technology, equipment installers may confirm both one and two way communications abilities of newly installed network devices as well as receive network diagnostic related data to assist them in the equipment installation process. Validation of communications operation may be initiated by any of the newly installed equipment, a handheld device, or via mobile device communications.