Network Data Path Loopback Testing for Fiber Connectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing network connectivity between geographically separated devices are impractical due to the physical length of the network, making manual inspection impossible, and require a cost-effective and efficient solution to diagnose communication failures without manual intervention.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a switchable loopback mechanism and flow controllable buffers to inject deterministic data into a network path, loop it back, and analyze for errors, allowing for a line rate test of downstream traffic paths without manual inspection, using dedicated cards to maintain the loop and verify transmission errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection of network connection is performed, then connection quality can be directly verified, but it becomes impossible when devices are geographically separated by long distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection quality verificationVSAvoidmanual inspection feasibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The network connection performs self-diagnosis by automatically injecting test data through the data path and comparing transmitted data with received data to identify transmission errors, eliminating the need for manual inspection by technicians

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual physical inspection with an automated electronic testing system that uses data injection, loopback mechanisms, and error detection algorithms to verify connection quality across long distances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If automated testing is implemented to enable long-distance network testing, then manual inspection limitations are overcome, but system complexity increases due to additional testing components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated testing capabilityVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is integrated into existing network devices, allowing them to perform both normal data transmission and automated testing functions, reducing the need for separate dedicated testing equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A loopback mechanism serves as an intermediary component that redirects transmitted data back to the source for comparison, enabling automated testing without requiring complex direct measurement systems between geographically separated devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring is performed to detect transmission errors in real-time, then connection quality is continuously verified, but network bandwidth is consumed by test data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection quality assuranceVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Automated testing is performed periodically rather than continuously, with test data injected at scheduled intervals to balance connection verification needs with available network bandwidth for normal traffic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system injects a controlled amount of test data that is sufficient to detect transmission errors but limited in volume to minimize impact on network bandwidth availability for productive traffic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8085675B2Method and apparatus to test a data path in a network
Publication Date: 2011.12.27 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US8085675B2 patent drawing
  • US8085675B2 patent drawing
  • US8085675B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for testing a data path in a network is described. The method may comprise creating a closed loop in the data path so that test data (e.g., fixed set of known data) sent from a local network device to a downstream network device is returned by the downstream network device. Thereafter, the test data is injected into the closed loop and selectively extracted from the loop. The test data may then be processed. The method may create the closed loop by closing a first loopback mechanism at the local network device and closing a second loopback mechanism at the downstream network device. In an example embodiment, the method determines whether the identified errors exceed a threshold number of errors. The method may be utilized to determine if fiber connectivity of the data path has failed when the identified errors exceed the threshold.