Network Device Configuration via Traffic Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network professionals face challenges in configuring network devices due to the complexity and variability of new settings and features, leading to potential conflicts and suboptimal performance, especially in mission-critical environments, which can result in inadequate Quality of Service (QoS) and increased costs for testing and training.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to generate and apply traffic data to network devices, monitor their performance, analyze the output, and store the results in a knowledge database to provide recommended configuration settings and predicted results, allowing for quick and confident setup of network devices without the need for costly test labs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If detailed manuals and training courses are provided to help network professionals configure new devices, then the accuracy and reliability of configuration is improved, but the time required for learning and setup increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidlearning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating configuration parameters and predicted performance metrics before the actual network device setup. The knowledge base pre-stores configuration data from numerous tested devices, allowing network professionals to retrieve recommended settings instantly without manual research or training, thus resolving the contradiction between configuration accuracy and learning time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of the configuration process by using a knowledge base that replicates the results of extensive manual testing and configuration. Instead of network professionals manually configuring devices and learning from manuals, the system copies proven configuration patterns from the knowledge base, providing accurate settings immediately while eliminating the time-consuming learning curve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If network professionals set up test networks to verify proper operations before deployment, then the reliability of QoS settings is improved, but the cost and complexity of the setup process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS performanceVSAvoidtest network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system copies the results of complex test network setups by storing performance data and configuration outcomes in a knowledge base. Instead of network professionals building physical test networks with multiple devices and traffic generators, the system provides virtual copies of tested configurations and predicted performance metrics, maintaining QoS reliability while eliminating the complexity and cost of actual test network infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The knowledge base acts as an intermediary between theoretical configuration requirements and actual network deployment. It mediates by providing pre-validated configuration parameters and predicted performance metrics that bridge the gap between planning and implementation, eliminating the need for complex intermediate test network setups while ensuring QoS reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If network professionals rely on basic knowledge and experience to configure devices quickly, then the setup time is reduced, but the risk of inadequate QoS and suboptimal performance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup speedVSAvoidQoS adequacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by delivering predicted performance metrics alongside configuration recommendations. This feedback mechanism allows network professionals to quickly implement configurations while receiving immediate information about expected QoS performance, eliminating the need to choose between speed and reliability. The feedback loop ensures that fast setup does not compromise QoS adequacy by providing real-time performance predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If manufacturers provide comprehensive training courses to ensure proper device configuration, then the quality of network setup is improved, but the time and resource expenditure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration qualityVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system copies the value of comprehensive training by encoding expertise and configuration knowledge directly into the knowledge base. Instead of network professionals investing time in training courses to learn configuration best practices, the system provides ready-to-use, proven configurations and performance predictions, achieving the same configuration quality without the time investment required for formal training

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service configuration by allowing network professionals to independently retrieve recommended settings and performance metrics from the knowledge base without requiring formal training. The system serves itself by providing self-explanatory configuration parameters and predicted outcomes, eliminating the need for time-consuming training while maintaining high configuration quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7975190B2System and method for network device configuration
Publication Date: 2011.07.05 LIVEACTION
  • US7975190B2 patent drawing
  • US7975190B2 patent drawing
  • US7975190B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stream of traffic data is generated, where the traffic data has a known characteristic. The stream of traffic data is applied to the network device, where the network device has a specific type. The network device generates an output based on the traffic data. A performance of the network device is monitored while the traffic data is processed by the network device to generate monitoring data for the traffic data applied to the network device having the specific type. The output from the network device is analyzed to identify how the traffic data was handled by the network device to generate performance metrics. The monitoring data and the performance metrics are saved to a knowledge database. The knowledge database can be accessed to enable configuration of other network devices based in part on the monitoring data and performance metrics.