Network Information Spreading Control via Eigenvector Centrality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for managing network information spreading, whether to enhance or hinder it, lack effective design improvements due to their focus on whole-graph properties and neglect of network structure, leading to inefficiencies in controlling the spread of information.

Innovation Solution

The use of eigenvector centrality (EVC) to analyze network structure and identify well-connected clusters and 'neighbourhoods' within the network, allowing for targeted design modifications to enhance or inhibit information spreading by modifying links and node connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If whole-graph properties are used to analyze network spreading, then the analysis is simpler and more general, but the control precision and effectiveness are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis complexityVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into local neighbourhoods around seed nodes rather than treating the whole graph uniformly. Each neighbourhood is analyzed independently to identify local spread patterns, enabling precise control while maintaining manageable complexity through modular analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by focusing analysis on the specific neighbourhoods surrounding seed nodes rather than the entire network. This allows identification of local spread characteristics and targeted intervention strategies that are optimized for each specific area's structure and dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If network topology is modified to enhance information spreading, then information dissemination efficiency improves, but the complexity of network management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation dissemination efficiencyVSAvoidnetwork management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-identifying seed nodes and their neighbourhoods before the spreading process begins. This allows proactive modification of network topology in critical areas to enhance desired spreading, rather than reacting to spread patterns after they develop, thereby improving efficiency while managing complexity through advance planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by monitoring the actual spread of information within neighbourhoods and using this information to adjust network modifications. This iterative approach allows optimization of spreading efficiency while controlling management complexity through data-driven decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If targeted node identification is performed to control information spreading, then control effectiveness improves, but the computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into local neighbourhoods around seed nodes, allowing targeted identification and control within these localized regions. This segmentation reduces the computational burden compared to analyzing the entire network, while still achieving effective control through focus on critical local areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on identifying and modifying only the neighbourhoods of seed nodes rather than the entire network. This selective approach achieves sufficient control effectiveness without the excessive computational complexity that would result from comprehensive network analysis and modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP1900148B1Methods for spreading or preventing spreading of information in a network
Publication Date: 2009.01.07 TELENOR AS
  • EP1900148B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1900148B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1900148B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for improved spreading of information in a network is described, together with corresponding methods with the opposite aim, namely to hinder the spreading of harmful information in a network. The harmful information may be (for example) a data virus. The first method includes as its characterizing feature to connect at least one node of high Eigenvector Centrality Index in a first region with at least one node of high Eigenvector Centrality Index in a second region. These connections may be made using direct links, or with the help of a new node lying between the nodes to be connected. One method for preventing spreading of information or physical traffic in a network may include as its characterizing feature to inoculate at least one centre node by blocking any transmission of unwanted information on all links in/out of said centre node. Another method for preventing spreading of information or physical traffic may be to inoculate all nodes in a ring of nodes surrounding a centre node by blocking any transmission of unwanted information on all links in/out of said nodes. Still another method may be to inoculate at least one bridge link connecting two regions by blocking any transmission of unwanted information on said link.