Network Event Detection Using Cascaded Classifiers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in accurately detecting rare events, such as near silent issues in network nodes, due to the difficulty in finding an accurate rule set, high misdetection rates, and imbalanced data sets, leading to both missed real issues and false alarms, which affect user experience and service maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A method involving cascaded classifiers, including a first classifier for preliminary filtering and a second machine learning-based SVM classifier, with a Radial Basis Function kernel, to determine event occurrence by adjusting thresholds based on training results, leveraging domain knowledge and supervised learning to mitigate class imbalance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single classifier with rule set is used for event detection, then the detection process is simple, but the misdetection rate is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection process complexityVSAvoidevent detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple classifiers arranged in a cascade structure. The first classifier performs preliminary filtering using simple rules, while the second classifier handles more complex classification. This segmentation reduces the misdetection rate by dividing the detection task into manageable stages, each optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first classifier performs preliminary filtering before the second classifier processes the data. By pre-filtering samples that clearly satisfy or don't satisfy the event conditions, the system reduces the burden on the second classifier and minimizes misdetections while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional rule-based detection is used, then the implementation is straightforward, but it fails to handle imbalanced datasets effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoiddetection precision for rare events
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts classification thresholds based on the specific characteristics of the dataset and event rarity. By changing the decision parameters adaptively rather than using fixed rules, the system achieves high precision and recall rates even for rare events in imbalanced datasets, while maintaining reasonable implementation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The first classifier acts as an intermediary between the raw data and the second classifier. It pre-processes the data by applying initial filtering rules, transforming the imbalanced dataset into a more manageable form that the second classifier can handle effectively, thus bridging the gap between simple implementation and high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple classifiers are cascaded to reduce misdetection rate, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection accuracyVSAvoidclassifier system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cascade classifier system is segmented into two distinct stages with clearly defined responsibilities. The first classifier handles preliminary filtering with simple rules, while the second classifier focuses on complex classification. This segmentation improves detection accuracy while controlling system complexity by avoiding unnecessary cascading stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first classifier applies partial action by only performing preliminary filtering on samples that meet basic criteria. It doesn't attempt to classify all samples comprehensively, but rather filters out obvious cases, allowing the second classifier to focus computational resources on ambiguous cases that require more sophisticated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12513552B2Method and apparatus for detecting event in communication network
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12513552B2 patent drawing
  • US12513552B2 patent drawing
  • US12513552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for detecting event in a communication network. The method performed at a network node may comprise: obtaining at least one parameter associated to an event; determining, by a first classifier, whether a first measurement result of the at least one parameter satisfies at least one rule; classifying, by a second classifier, a second measurement result of the at least one parameter, when the first measurement result of the at least one parameter satisfies the at least one rule; and determining whether the event happens based on a classifying result of the second measurement result of the at least one parameter. More than one classifier may be cascaded, so as to reduce a misdetection rate.