Network Fail-Over Logic for Logical Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In computer networks, static configuration of next-hops can lead to unreachability when a next-hop becomes unavailable, and existing fail-over solutions do not efficiently manage fail-over across multiple logical interfaces sharing a physical medium, affecting network reliability.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for managing fail-over by configuring backup devices to process traffic on monitored physical interfaces, where a logical interface failure triggers fail-over across associated logical interfaces, using a high-availability protocol to determine role changes between master and backup devices, ensuring continuous network operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple independent devices are used for redundant next-hops with per-interface fail-over, then network reliability is improved, but device complexity and configuration management increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidconfiguration management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple logical interface fail-overs into a single consolidated fail-over mechanism. Instead of running independent HA protocols on each logical interface, the system combines them under a unified fail-over manager that monitors all logical interfaces and coordinates fail-over actions centrally, reducing configuration complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fail-over mechanism is designed to be universal across multiple logical interfaces sharing a physical medium. A single HA protocol implementation can manage fail-over for multiple virtual IP addresses and logical interfaces simultaneously, making the system multi-functional without requiring separate configurations for each interface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If an HA protocol is run on each logical interface for fail-over, then fail-over capability is improved, but processing overhead and system resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefail-over capabilityVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple HA protocol instances are merged into a single consolidated HA process that handles all logical interfaces. The system combines the monitoring, decision-making, and execution functions into one unified process, eliminating the redundant processing overhead of running separate HA protocols on each logical interface while maintaining comprehensive fail-over capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If static next-hop configuration is used, then configuration simplicity is improved, but network availability deteriorates when next-hop becomes unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration simplicityVSAvoidnetwork availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary configuration of multiple redundant next-hops with defined priority levels and fail-over conditions. Backup next-hops are pre-configured and monitored, so when a failure occurs, the system can immediately switch to the predetermined backup without requiring runtime configuration changes or complex decision-making, thus maintaining both simplicity and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7769862B2Method and system for efficiently failing over interfaces in a network
Publication Date: 2010.08.03 CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECH INC
  • US7769862B2 patent drawing
  • US7769862B2 patent drawing
  • US7769862B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus is directed towards managing fail-over in a network. At least one back-up device is configured to process traffic if a fail-over condition occurs. The back-up device includes a physical interface. A logical interface X associated with the physical interface is monitored to determine if the fail-over condition has occurred. If it is determined that the fail-over condition has occurred on interface X, then the back-up device processes traffic for another logical interface Y, associated with the physical interface. Accordingly, logical interface Y may be unmonitored. According to one embodiment, if it is determined that the fail-over condition has occurred, the back-up device processes traffic for every logical interface associated with the physical interface.