Network Feedback Simulation Injection for Remote Decision Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Remote operation systems are adversely affected by network connectivity issues and capability limitations, leading to potential failures in decision-making processes.

Innovation Solution

Simulating network feedback parameters and injecting them into decision-making processes to enhance remote operation, particularly in vehicles, by using a simulation injector to generate and apply simulated network feedback until actual feedback is received.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If remote operation systems rely on actual network feedback for decision-making, then decision accuracy is improved, but response time deteriorates when network connectivity is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by simulating network feedback locally before actual feedback is received. The simulation injector generates predicted network feedback parameters (latency, packet loss, bandwidth) in advance, allowing the decision-making system to prepare potential responses without waiting for actual network feedback, thus reducing response time while maintaining decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A simulation injector is introduced as an intermediary component between the actual network and the decision-making system. This intermediary generates simulated network feedback that mimics real network conditions, allowing the system to make decisions based on predicted feedback while the actual network feedback is still being transmitted, effectively decoupling decision speed from network speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system waits for actual network feedback before making decisions, then decision reliability is improved, but system productivity deteriorates due to network delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision reliabilityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates copies of expected network feedback through simulation. Instead of waiting for the original network feedback, the simulation injector generates replicated feedback data based on historical patterns and current network conditions, allowing multiple decisions to be processed in parallel without blocking on network I/O, thus improving throughput while maintaining reliability through validation against actual feedback when received.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary decision-making actions using simulated feedback before actual network feedback arrives. This allows the system to process multiple potential decisions in advance, queue them for execution, and then validate or adjust them when real feedback is received, effectively overlapping computation with network transmission time to improve overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If simulated network feedback is used to compensate for network degradation, then response time is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates compared to actual feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidfeedback accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation injector dynamically adjusts the fidelity and granularity of simulated feedback based on network conditions and system state. When actual feedback is available, the system uses real data; when network degradation is detected, it transitions to simulation with configurable accuracy levels, allowing the system to optimize the balance between response time and precision dynamically rather than using a fixed approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where simulated feedback is continuously validated against actual network feedback when available. Discrepancies between simulated and actual feedback are used to refine and recalibrate the simulation model, improving its accuracy over time. This meta-feedback mechanism ensures that simulated feedback becomes progressively more precise while maintaining the speed advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250358194A1Techniques for enhanced congestion control using network feedback simulation
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 OTTOPIA TECH LTD
  • US20250358194A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358194A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358194A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for network feedback simulation injection. A method includes simulating network feedback for one or more communication channels used by a system and injecting the simulated network feedback into one or more decision-making processes. The simulated network feedback includes one or more simulated network parameters indicating values of corresponding network performance metrics. The decision-making processes are configured to make system decisions based on network feedback data.