Network Operation Fraud Control Using Digital Fingerprints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network operation systems struggle to distinguish between malicious and non-malicious entities, leading to unauthorized access and significant resource consumption, as they rely on checking every request without adequate entity identification.

Innovation Solution

Implement a machine learning model that analyzes digital fingerprints, network operation metrics, and risk factors to determine the likelihood of fraud, enabling selective mitigation actions and dashboard interfaces for enhanced security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the server checks every request to determine authorization, then security against unauthorized access is improved, but computing resource consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of request patterns, entity identities, and behavioral metrics before full request processing. By pre-evaluating entities using machine learning models on historical data and digital fingerprints, the system identifies suspicious entities in advance, allowing selective application of intensive security checks only to high-risk requests rather than all requests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of security inspection to different entities based on their risk profiles. High-risk entities undergo comprehensive multi-factor analysis including behavioral biometrics and pattern recognition, while low-risk entities receive streamlined validation. This localized quality approach ensures strong security where needed while conserving resources on routine transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the server checks request parameters to block unauthorized access, then security is improved, but the server cannot distinguish between malicious and non-malicious entities with authorized requests

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidentity identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system moves beyond traditional single-dimension request parameter validation by incorporating multiple dimensions of entity identification. These include digital fingerprints, behavioral biometrics, historical transaction patterns, device characteristics, and network metadata. This multi-dimensional approach enables precise differentiation between malicious and benign entities even when their requests use identical authorized parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary analysis layers between request receipt and execution. Machine learning models and behavioral analysis services act as intermediaries that evaluate entity credibility independently of request content. These intermediaries analyze entity behavior, digital fingerprints, and historical data to generate risk scores that inform authorization decisions, enabling distinction between authorized malicious and authorized benign entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the server processes and evaluates each individual request, then request-level security control is improved, but computing resources are consumed inefficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest security controlVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments security evaluation into distinct hierarchical levels: entity-level assessment using digital fingerprints and historical behavior, request-level validation of parameters and signatures, and transaction-level monitoring. This segmentation allows pre-computed entity risk profiles to be reused across multiple requests, avoiding redundant analysis while maintaining comprehensive security control at each level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary entity characterization and risk classification before processing individual requests. By pre-establishing entity profiles using machine learning models trained on historical data, the system creates reusable security contexts that accelerate subsequent request evaluation. This preliminary action reduces per-request processing overhead while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260006051A1Systems and methods for controlling computing systems associated with network operations
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 STRIPE LLC
  • US20260006051A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006051A1 patent drawing
  • US20260006051A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Presented herein are systems and methods of evaluating network operations associated with computing systems. A server may receive, from a computing system, an electronic request to execute a first network operation using a plurality of attributes provided by an end user device to the computing system. The first network operation may be initiated via the end user device. The server may retrieve (i) a digital fingerprint associated with an identity of the computing system and (ii) a plurality of network operation metrics associated with the computing system. The server may execute, using the digital fingerprint and the plurality of network operation metrics, a machine learning (ML) model to generate a likelihood of fraud caused by the computing system. The server may, in response to the likelihood of fraud satisfying a threshold, execute a second network operation using the plurality of attributes, instead of executing the first network operation.