Network Hologram for Real-Time Data Breach Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing network security tools fail to provide reliable real-time detection of ongoing data breaches in computer networks, leading to inadequate visibility and ineffective prevention and remediation measures, especially in cloud-based and distributed systems.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method using a network hologram to monitor and compare data movement in real-time, establishing a baseline behavior and detecting anomalous movements to identify data breaches, thereby connecting users, devices, and applications with the flow of data, reducing false positives and enabling immediate preventive measures.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If existing network security tools are used to monitor data movement, then network security monitoring is performed, but real-time detection of ongoing data breaches is not achieved
Solution Approach 1:
The system pre-establishes baseline behavior profiles for normal data movement patterns before monitoring begins. These baselines include expected data volumes, frequencies, destinations, and relationships between network elements. When monitoring starts, actual data movement is immediately compared against these pre-established baselines, enabling real-time anomaly detection without requiring analysis historical data accumulation.
Solution Approach 2:
The system continuously compares actual data movement against baseline behavior and provides immediate feedback when deviations are detected. This feedback loop operates in real-time, allowing the system to identify ongoing data breaches as they occur rather than after the fact. The feedback mechanism enables dynamic adjustment and immediate alerting when anomalous patterns are recognized.
2Measurement precision
If comprehensive network monitoring is implemented to improve detection capability, then visibility into network activities increases, but false positives increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the analysis into multiple dimensions including data volume, frequency, destination, source, and relationships between network elements. Each dimension is evaluated separately against its own baseline, and only when multiple segments simultaneously deviate from normal behavior is an anomaly flagged. This multi-dimensional segmentation reduces false positives by requiring convergence of multiple anomaly indicators.
Solution Approach 2:
The baseline behavior profiles are dynamic and adapt to changing normal patterns in the network. Rather than using static thresholds, the system continuously learns and adjusts what constitutes normal behavior based on ongoing observations. This dynamic approach allows the system to accommodate legitimate changes in network usage patterns while maintaining sensitivity to actual breaches.
3Adaptability or versatility
If traditional security tools are used, then basic security monitoring is provided, but relationship-based analysis among multiple network elements is not performed
Solution Approach 1:
The system uses a unified baseline comparison mechanism that handles multiple types of network elements (users, devices, applications, data) and multiple analysis dimensions through a single analytical framework. Rather than requiring separate tools for different analysis types, this universal approach compares all data movement against established baselines using the same core logic, simplifying the system architecture while maintaining comprehensive analysis capability.
Data Source
AI summary
The disclosed teachings include a computer-implemented method a computer-implemented method for identifying a data breach. The method includes monitoring movement of data over a computer network in real-time or near real-time relative to at least one of a user, a device, or a software application, comparing the monitored movement of the data to a baseline movement of the data over the computer network in real-time or near real-time relative to at least one of the user, the device, or the software application, and identifying an ongoing data breach in real-time or near real-time based on the comparison. The identified ongoing data breach indicates a relationship between the data and at least one of the user, the device, and the software application.


