Network Infection Risk Prediction via Distance-Based Probability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional systems for predicting malware spread between connected devices often fail to account for all factors, particularly when infected and at-risk devices are on different networks with different administrators, leading to increased infection risks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that determines the distance between connected devices, detects malware infections, calculates infection probabilities based on this distance, and performs security actions to reduce infection risk when probabilities meet a predetermined threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional malware prediction systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of infection risk is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfection risk prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the network into multiple layers including L2 network segments, L3 network segments, and cloud environments. Each segment is assigned a specific risk weight factor, allowing precise measurement of infection risk at different network levels while maintaining manageable system complexity through hierarchical organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multiple dimensions for risk assessment beyond simple connectivity, including network segment layers (L2, L3, cloud), device types (IoT, mobile, desktop), and communication protocols. This multi-dimensional approach significantly improves measurement precision by considering various factors simultaneously without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive network monitoring is implemented across different networks, then measurement precision improves, but loss of information increases due to different administrators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfection detection accuracyVSAvoidinfection data availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces intermediary components including gateway devices that connect different network segments, intermediary servers that aggregate data from multiple administrators, and centralized risk calculation servers. These intermediaries facilitate information sharing across administrative boundaries while maintaining data availability and improving infection detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal data formats and communication protocols that work across different network administrators' systems. The risk calculation framework is designed to be administrator-agnostic, accepting infection data from any source and processing it through standardized procedures, thus preventing information loss while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If distance-based infection probability calculation is implemented, then reliability of security predictions improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity prediction accuracyVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by assigning specific risk weight factors to different network segment layers (L2, L3, cloud) and device types. Instead of complex mathematical distance calculations, the patent uses weighted parameter aggregation where each network segment and device type contributes a predetermined weight to the overall infection probability, improving reliability while keeping the calculation system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If proactive security actions are deployed across multiple networks, then reliability of protection improves, but loss of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by deploying security measures proportionally based on calculated infection probabilities. Instead of uniform proactive protection across all devices, the patent implements security actions only on devices exceeding specific risk thresholds, optimizing protection effectiveness while minimizing unnecessary energy consumption on low-risk devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10277624B1Systems and methods for reducing infection risk of computing systems
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 CA TECH INC
  • US10277624B1 patent drawing
  • US10277624B1 patent drawing
  • US10277624B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed computer-implemented method for reducing infection risk of computing systems may include (i) determining a distance between a computing system that is connected to a local network and an additional computing system that is not connected to the local network but is connected to the computing system via a series of connected devices, (ii) detecting that the additional computing system is infected with malware, (iii) calculating an infection probability for the computing system that is based at least in part on the distance between the computing system and the additional computing system that is infected, and (iv) performing a security action on the computing system that reduces a risk of infection of the computing system in response to the infection probability for the computing system meeting a predetermined threshold for infection probability. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.