Network Interface Control Isolation for Multiprocessor Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing networked computer systems face limitations in achieving high functional efficiencies due to generic I/O treatment, which fails to account for network workload idiosyncrasies, leading to constraints in network throughput, latency, packet rate, and processing overhead, and lacks scalability and adaptability in multiprocessor systems.

Innovation Solution

A network system that separates and isolates control of processing entities, utilizing a network interface unit connected to multiple processing entities and memory units, with a packet classifier and scheduling control modules to manage data processing, allowing asymmetric allocation of resources and efficient interrupt event notification, enabling parallel packet movement and scalable data processing partitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If generic I/O treatment is used for network interface functionality, then system generality and modularity are maintained, but network processing efficiency, throughput, and latency are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem generality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The network interface functionality is segmented into separate processing entities (network processing entity and host processing entity) with distinct control mechanisms. The network processing entity handles network-specific operations independently while the host processing entity manages host-specific operations, allowing specialized optimization without compromising overall system generality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different control mechanisms are applied to different processing entities based on their specific requirements. The network processing entity receives network-specific control signals while the host processing entity receives host-specific control signals, enabling localized optimization for each entity's functional characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If multiple processors service a network interface with shared queues, then processing capacity increases, but coordination overhead and difficulty in achieving processor-session affinity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidcoordination overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Queues are segmented into dedicated queues for each processing entity rather than shared queues. Each processor has its own private queue, eliminating the need for complex coordination mechanisms and affinity management while maintaining high processing capacity through parallel operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coordination and affinity management overhead is extracted from the multi-processor system by giving each processor its own dedicated queue. This removes the need for inter-processor coordination mechanisms, reducing system complexity while preserving parallel processing benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If symmetric sharing of computing resources across layers is used, then multiprocessor readiness is achieved, but processing efficiency and resource utilization are reduced due to time slicing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultiprocessor readinessVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into distinct processing entities (network processing entity and host processing entity) that operate independently with dedicated control mechanisms. This segmentation allows each entity to execute its assigned tasks without time slicing interruptions, improving processing efficiency while maintaining multiprocessor readiness through the modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7992144B1Method and apparatus for separating and isolating control of processing entities in a network interface
Publication Date: 2011.08.02 ORACLE AMERICAN INC
  • US7992144B1 patent drawing
  • US7992144B1 patent drawing
  • US7992144B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network system that provides for separating and isolating control of processing entities in a network interface. A network interface unit is operably connected to a plurality of processing entities and a plurality of memory units that define a shared memory space. The network interface unit further comprises a memory access module that includes a plurality of memory access channels, a packet classifier, and a plurality of scheduling control modules that are operable to control processing of data transported by the network. One of the processing entities operates as a hypervisor to configure control resources to isolate operation of the plurality of data processing partitions to process data transported by the network system. The packet classifier is operable to provide an association between packets and the plurality of asymmetrical data processing. In various embodiments of the invention, the asymmetrical data processing partitions can comprise a plurality of processor cores, a single processor core, a combination of strands of an individual processor core or a single strand of an individual processor core. The asymmetrical data processing partitions are scalable by adding additional processing entities.