Network I/O Circuitry for Remote Storage Command Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computing arrangements consume substantial operating system and host processor bandwidth, increase energy consumption and heat dissipation, and introduce latency when a client accesses storage via a server, particularly due to the lack of built-in security checks in NVMe controllers for remote direct memory access (RDMA) operations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of circuitry in a server's network I/O device to validate commands for accessing storage devices, using operation codes and namespace identifiers to authenticate and authorize remote clients, thereby reducing the involvement of the operating system and host processor, and employing RDMA protocols like iWARP, IB, or RoCE for efficient data transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the server's operating system, associated drivers, and host processor process requests received by the server's NW I/O device, then the requests can be properly handled and executed, but substantial amounts of operating system and host processor processing bandwidth are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing reliabilityVSAvoidprocessor bandwidth availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the command validation function from the server's operating system and host processor, implementing it instead in the client's NW I/O device. This validation function checks whether received commands are valid and properly formatted before processing, thereby maintaining request handling reliability while freeing up substantial processor bandwidth for other tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation layer in the client's NW I/O device that acts as a mediator between the client application and the server. This intermediary performs command validation locally, eliminating the need for the server's operating system and host processor to spend bandwidth validating each command, thus resolving the contradiction between reliable processing and bandwidth availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the server's operating system, associated drivers, and host processor process requests received by the server's NW I/O device, then the requests can be properly handled and executed, but the amount of energy consumed and heat dissipated by the host processor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing reliabilityVSAvoidhost processor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the computationally intensive command validation operations from the host processor and relocates them to the client's NW I/O device. This extraction maintains the reliability of request processing while significantly reducing the energy consumption and heat dissipation of the host processor, as validation is performed locally at the client side.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the client's NW I/O device to autonomously validate commands before transmission. This self-validation capability eliminates the need for the server's host processor to expend energy on validation operations, thereby reducing overall system energy consumption while maintaining processing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the server's operating system, associated drivers, and host processor process requests received by the server's NW I/O device, then the requests can be properly handled and executed, but the latency involved in processing the requests issued by the client's NW I/O device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing reliabilityVSAvoidrequest processing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing command validation in advance at the client's NW I/O device before commands are transmitted to the server. This pre-validation ensures that only properly formatted and valid commands are sent, eliminating the need for the server's operating system and host processor to spend time on validation during request processing, thereby reducing overall latency while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation layer in the client's NW I/O device that performs command validation locally before transmission. This intermediary action reduces the processing latency at the server side by ensuring commands are already validated, while maintaining the reliability of request handling through proper validation checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11755527B2Techniques for command validation for access to a storage device by a remote client
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 TAHOE RES LTD
  • US11755527B2 patent drawing
  • US11755527B2 patent drawing
  • US11755527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples are disclosed for access to a storage device maintained at a server. In some examples, a network input/output device coupled to the server may allocate, in a memory of the server, a buffer, a doorbell, and a queue pair accessible to a client remote to the server. For these examples, the network input/output device may assign an Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) namespace context to the client. For these examples, indications of the allocated buffer, doorbell, queue pair, and namespace context may be transmitted to the client. Other examples are described and claimed.