Network Main Device Automatic Configuration via Model Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer network management systems lack efficient methods to detect and differentiate between changes in network topology and device information, particularly in large networks, leading to difficulties in identifying new or replaced devices and configuring them appropriately.

Innovation Solution

A main device in the network that compares network information with a stored model to detect differences, using unique addresses and configuration data to identify new or replaced devices and automatically configure them, utilizing protocols like LLDP for network discovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual configuration methods are used for network devices, then configuration accuracy can be maintained, but the time and labor required for configuring and managing devices in large networks increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork configuration efficiencyVSAvoidtime for device configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-configuration of network devices by comparing detected network information against stored models. The main device automatically identifies topology changes and device information changes, then configures devices without manual intervention, allowing the network to configure itself autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system stores network models representing expected network states in advance. By having pre-configured models of correct network topology and device information, the system can quickly compare actual states against these predetermined models and automatically correct deviations, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive network monitoring is implemented to detect all changes, then detection precision improves, but the complexity of the monitoring system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is divided into two independent modules: one dedicated to detecting topology changes (addition/removal of devices or links) and another for detecting device information changes (configuration modifications). This segmentation allows each module to focus on specific detection tasks, improving precision while keeping individual module complexities manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a main device that acts as an intermediary between network devices and the monitoring logic. This main device collects network information from all devices, compares it against stored models, and coordinates the detection process, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high detection precision through centralized model-based comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automatic configuration is implemented without verification, then configuration speed increases, but the reliability of network configuration decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration speedVSAvoidconfiguration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the network and automatically compares detected network information against stored network models. This feedback mechanism verifies whether the actual network state matches the expected state, allowing the system to detect configuration errors and trigger corrective actions, thereby ensuring configuration reliability while maintaining speed through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By storing predetermined network models representing correct network states in advance, the system has verification criteria ready before configuration occurs. This allows immediate verification of configuration changes against the stored models, ensuring reliability without sacrificing the speed benefits of automatic configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10728093B2Main device for use in a computer network, computer network, method for configuring a computer network and computer program
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US10728093B2 patent drawing
  • US10728093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A main device for use in a computer network, wherein the computer network has a topology and comprises a plurality of interconnected devices, wherein each of the plurality of interconnected devices comprises device information and at least one network port, wherein the devices are interconnected with the computer network by network links, each network link connecting two respective network ports, wherein the main device is interconnected with at least one of devices by a connection, and configured to obtain network information, wherein the network information comprised the topology of the computer network and the device information of the plurality of interconnected devices in the network, retrieve a stored network model, wherein the network model comprises a defined topology of the computer network and defined device information, and compare the network information with the network model to provide the differences between the network information and the network model as distinction data.