Collaborative Network Node Integration via Stochastic Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for integrating new users into collaborative networks are inefficient and lack evaluation for speed or effectiveness, as they rely on centralized control systems that do not adequately address the integration process.

Innovation Solution

A method that constructs a collaborative network graph using interaction data, performs stochastic simulations to simulate the integration of a new node, and selects the best simulation to generate an integration recommendation by adjusting node weights or adding edges, thereby optimizing the integration process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If centralized control systems are used to manage user integration, then system control is maintained, but integration speed and effectiveness are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing new users to automatically integrate into the collaborative network through algorithmic matching based on interaction patterns, eliminating the need for centralized manual assignment and significantly speeding up the integration process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical centralized control system with a computational algorithm that analyzes network graph data and interaction patterns to automatically determine optimal user placements, substituting manual administrative processes with automated data-driven decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If stochastic simulations are performed to evaluate integration options, then integration effectiveness is improved, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a limited number of stochastic simulations (e.g., 10-100 iterations) rather than exhaustive simulations, providing sufficiently reliable integration recommendations within acceptable computational timeframes by performing partial action that achieves adequate rather than perfect optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts simulation parameters such as the number of iterations, confidence thresholds, and weighting factors to balance computational efficiency with recommendation reliability, allowing the system to adapt the level of simulation depth based on specific integration scenarios and time constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12020208B1Dynamically integrating nodes into a collaborate network
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12020208B1 patent drawing
  • US12020208B1 patent drawing
  • US12020208B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Using data of a plurality of interactions within a collaborative network, a collaborative network graph is constructed. Each node in the collaborative network graph represents a participant in an interaction, and each edge in the collaborative network graph represents an interaction between participants represented by corresponding nodes. Using a plurality of stochastic simulations of changes to the collaborative network graph, integration of a new node into the collaborative network is simulated. A simulation in the plurality of stochastic simulations producing a largest score improvement between scores computed on the collaborative network graph is selected as a best simulation. Using a plurality of changes to the collaborative network graph included in the best simulation, an integration recommendation is constructed, in which a portion of the integration recommendation corresponds to a change in the plurality of changes.