Network Node Admission for Privileged Access Under Congestion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication networks face challenges in prioritizing network access for privileged users, such as public safety agencies and first responders, when internal capacity limitations are reached, leading to rejection of new UE context admission requests.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a mechanism where network nodes and user equipment (UE) indicate privileged access (PA) even during congestion, allowing reserved resources and preemptible processes to ensure priority access for PA UEs, such as High Priority Access (HPA) and Emergency (EC) UEs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the network node rejects new UE context admission requests when internal capacity limitations are reached, then the network resources are protected from exhaustion, but privileged users (public safety agencies and first responders) lose network access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork access reliability for privileged usersVSAvoidnetwork capacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network capacity into different pools: a first pool for conventional UEs and a second pool for privileged UEs. This segmentation allows the network to independently manage resources for different user categories, ensuring that privileged users maintain access even when conventional users exhaust their share of resources. The segmentation is implemented at multiple levels including UE context admission, radio bearer allocation, and scheduling decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-establishing reserved resources and preemptible processes for privileged users before congestion occurs. The network node reserves a portion of UE context resources and configures preemptible processes that can interrupt conventional user sessions when needed. This preliminary preparation ensures that when privileged users need access during congestion, the network can immediately activate reserved resources without waiting for conventional users to release them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the network node accepts all UE access requests during congestion, then network access is maintained for all users, but the network internal capacity limitations are reached and conventional users are rejected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork access availabilityVSAvoidnetwork capacity management
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different user categories differently at the network node. Privileged users receive preferential treatment in terms of resource allocation and admission decisions, while conventional users are treated normally. The network node makes locally optimized decisions for each user type based on their priority level, allowing simultaneous satisfaction of both accessibility and capacity management requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the network node continuously monitors network capacity status and adjusts admission decisions accordingly. When the network detects that internal capacity limitations are approaching, it activates preemptible processes and reserves resources for privileged users. This feedback loop ensures that the network maintains appropriate capacity management while still providing access to privileged users during congestion conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the network node implements preemptible processes for privileged users, then network access priority is ensured for PA UEs, but the complexity of network resource management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivileged user access priorityVSAvoidnetwork resource management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages complexity by segmenting the resource management function into distinct, manageable components: a first UE context pool for conventional users, a second UE context pool for privileged users, and predefined preemptible processes. This segmentation allows the network to handle privileged user priorities through standardized, pre-configured mechanisms rather than complex real-time decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent reduces operational complexity by implementing preliminary action through pre-defined preemptible processes and reserved resource pools. Rather than creating complex dynamic management systems, the network pre-configures what happens during congestion events, allowing automated, rule-based responses that are simpler to implement and manage than adaptive algorithms would be.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260040074A1Network node, user equipment and methods performed therein
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20260040074A1 patent drawing
  • US20260040074A1 patent drawing
  • US20260040074A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments herein may comprise a method performed by a network node (12) for handling access of a UE (10) in a communication network. The network node (12) receives a request for accessing the network node or a cell related to the network node, wherein the request comprises an indication indicating privileged access even if the network node, the cell and/or hardware of the network node is congested. The network node further determines, when the network node, the cell and/or the hardware of the network node is congested, to accept the request from the UE taking the indication into account.