Network Node Deployment Using Proxy Locations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for deploying surveillance nodes in three-dimensional outdoor environments are computationally inefficient, as they evaluate network fitness at each candidate location and factor in all network nodes, leading to suboptimal deployment strategies.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining a proxy location for each subregion of the terrain, computing network fitness based only on nearby nodes, and relocating nodes to optimize coverage, reducing computational complexity and improving deployment efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If network fitness is computed at each candidate location considering all network nodes, then deployment accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the network into multiple regions and selects representative proxy locations within each region. Instead of computing fitness at all candidate locations with all nodes, the system computes fitness only at proxy locations considering only nearby nodes, then assigns candidate locations to the best proxy location. This segmentation reduces computational complexity while maintaining deployment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and considers only the nearby nodes relevant to each candidate location rather than factoring in every network node. By identifying and isolating the subset of nodes that actually impact the fitness computation for a given location, the system reduces computational overhead while preserving the accuracy of deployment decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If all network nodes are factored into fitness computations, then network coverage optimization is improved, but computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverage optimizationVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by considering only the nearby nodes that are relevant to each candidate location's fitness computation. Different regions of the network are evaluated with their locally relevant nodes rather than using a uniform global computation approach. This reduces computational overhead while maintaining network coverage optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The network is segmented into multiple regions with proxy locations, and fitness computations are performed locally for each region rather than globally for the entire network. This segmentation allows the system to optimize network coverage while reducing the computational overhead associated with evaluating all nodes across the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If conventional deployment methods are used, then comprehensive evaluation is achieved, but deployment efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoiddeployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-dividing the network into regions and identifying proxy locations before the actual fitness computation. By preparing the spatial structure in advance and selecting representative locations, the system achieves comprehensive evaluation more efficiently, improving deployment efficiency without sacrificing evaluation thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses proxy locations as simplified representations or copies of the actual candidate locations. Instead of performing comprehensive evaluations at every candidate location, the system evaluates at proxy locations and assigns candidates to their best-matching proxy, achieving comprehensive evaluation results with reduced computational effort and improved deployment efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11558755B2Apparatus and method for efficient deployment of nodes in a network
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US11558755B2 patent drawing
  • US11558755B2 patent drawing
  • US11558755B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for efficient deployment of nodes in a network includes obtaining first data that indicates first locations of nodes in a network and terrain data that indicates height of terrain at terrain locations. The method further includes determining an exploration region for a first node and dividing the exploration region into subregions. The method further includes determining a proxy location for each subregion that is a location corresponding to a characteristic of the terrain data in the subregion. The method further includes determining a value of a parameter that indicates a contribution of the first node at each proxy location to network fitness. The method further includes assigning a second location to the first node based on the determined parameter value at each proxy location. The method further includes relocating the first node from the first location to the second location.