Network Path Selection Power Consumption Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reducing power consumption in networks focus on individual node optimization or optical bypasses, failing to consider network-wide power usage effectively, which limits overall energy efficiency and does not account for dynamic traffic conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine power consumption for each interface along possible paths in a network, allowing for path selection based on aggregate cost, enabling the network to choose paths that minimize overall power consumption without requiring new equipment, by advertising node information and controlling power-down modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If path selection is based on traditional metrics only, then routing decisions are simple, but power consumption cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork power consumptionVSAvoidpath selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and advertising power consumption values for each interface before path selection occurs. Nodes perform power consumption assessments and propagate this information through the network beforehand, allowing path computation elements to make informed decisions without performing complex real-time power analysis, thus resolving the contradiction between energy optimization and decision complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism through path computation elements that aggregate power consumption information from multiple nodes and perform centralized path optimization. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of power-aware path selection, allowing individual nodes to maintain simple operations while achieving network-wide power optimization through coordinated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If optical bypass paths are provided around routers, then electrical processing is reduced, but capital expenditure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode power consumptionVSAvoidcapital expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by enabling dynamic path selection that adapts to current network conditions and power consumption patterns. Instead of static optical bypass infrastructure, the system dynamically routes traffic through electrical or optical paths based on real-time power consumption data, allowing operators to optimize energy usage with existing infrastructure rather than requiring additional capital investment in optical bypass equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If interfaces are switched off to save power, then power consumption decreases, but network availability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface power consumptionVSAvoidnetwork availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where nodes continuously monitor and advertise their interface power consumption states and availability. Path computation elements receive this feedback information and dynamically adjust path selections to avoid interfaces that are powered down or may be unavailable, thus maintaining network reliability while still achieving power savings through coordinated interface management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9172549B2Reducing network power consumption
Publication Date: 2015.10.27 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US9172549B2 patent drawing
  • US9172549B2 patent drawing
  • US9172549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Path computation involves determining (120, 930) an aggregate cost for a portion of the path, based at least on the power consumption attributable to use of interfaces along that portion, comparing (130, 930) the portion of the first possible path with a different portion corresponding to a different possible path for the traffic request, based at least on their respective aggregate costs, and selecting (140, 930) which portion to use for the traffic request based on the comparison. Having path selection influenced by the power consumption values, can lead to lower overall consumption in operation than relying only on optimizing nodes individually without regard to how the nodes are used. Path selection can take into account indications of which parts are in a power down mode, and can involve powering up such parts if needed.