Network Peering for Disaster Recovery Failover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implementing site diversity in network service providers' networks to ensure reliable service availability during equipment failures is costly, as it requires geographical redundancy that can be financially burdensome for a single provider.

Innovation Solution

Establishing peering arrangements with other network providers to enable failover to partner networks in the event of a site failure, allowing cost-sharing and using partner networks' Application Servers to process calls, thereby diversifying call control and border elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single network provider implements site diversity with geographical redundancy, then service availability and reliability are improved, but implementation cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidinfrastructure cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges redundancy resources across multiple network providers through peering arrangements. Instead of each provider building separate redundant infrastructure, they share Application Servers and network resources across geographical locations, achieving collective site diversity while distributing costs among participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The peering arrangement creates a universal disaster recovery system where Application Servers can serve multiple network providers simultaneously. The same infrastructure serves multiple functions: primary service delivery for one provider and backup/disaster recovery for another, maximizing resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a network provider builds redundant infrastructure at every network element, then service continuity during failures is ensured, but cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidinfrastructure redundancy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces peering arrangements as an intermediary mechanism between network providers. This intermediary layer enables failover capability without requiring each provider to maintain full redundancy at every network element, as the peering infrastructure acts as a shared mediator for disaster recovery operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating complete physical copies of all network elements at every site, the patent uses virtualization and software-based Application Servers that can be replicated and migrated across locations. This allows service continuity through software-based failover rather than requiring identical hardware copies everywhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS7468984B1Method and apparatus for providing disaster recovery using network peering arrangements
Publication Date: 2008.12.23 AT&T CORP
  • US7468984B1 patent drawing
  • US7468984B1 patent drawing
  • US7468984B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention enables network providers to create peering arrangements with other providers that allow them to fail over to other networks in the event of a site failure. This invention would lower the cost to provide site diversity within a provider's network by allowing cost sharing between the provider's network and other networks. For example, when an Application Server (AS) in a network fails, the network provider can send a call to a partner's network and uses an AS in the partner's network to process the call request.