Network Power Feedback for Cross-Link Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inter-network-entity cross-link interference (CLI) in wireless communication systems degrades communication quality and increases latency, particularly in full duplex operations, due to excessive transmit power from neighboring network entities.

Innovation Solution

A first network entity measures CLI and provides a power adjustment recommendation to a second network entity, receiving a response or feedback rule, which allows for mitigating CLI by adjusting transmit power or altering communication strategies based on the response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If transmit power is increased to improve communication coverage and signal strength, then communication coverage is improved, but inter-network-entity cross-link interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication coverageVSAvoidinter-network-entity cross-link interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where network entities measure CLI from reference signals and send power adjustment recommendations back to the transmitting entity. The transmitting entity responds with acknowledgment or alternative recommendations, creating a closed-loop control system that dynamically adjusts transmit power to maintain coverage while reducing interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the transmit power parameter dynamically based on measured CLI conditions. Network entities adjust power levels by specific dB amounts (e.g., reducing by 3dB, 6dB, or 9dB) in response to interference measurements, allowing the system to adapt power parameters in real-time to balance coverage and interference reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If CLI measurement and power adjustment procedures are implemented to reduce interference, then communication quality is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidsignaling resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing CLI mitigation only for specific network entities that cause or experience significant interference, rather than universally for all entities. The first network entity selectively sends power adjustment recommendations based on measured CLI levels, reducing signaling overhead while maintaining communication quality where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If power adjustment recommendations are sent and responses are waited for to mitigate CLI, then interference reduction is achieved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-network-entity cross-link interferenceVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having network entities measure CLI using reference signals that are transmitted in advance of actual data communication. The power adjustment recommendations are prepared and sent beforehand, allowing the system to proactively mitigate interference before it degrades communication quality, rather than reacting after interference occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12538241B2Communication based on response to power adjustment recommendation or feedback rule
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12538241B2 patent drawing
  • US12538241B2 patent drawing
  • US12538241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a first network entity may receive measurement reference signals from a second network entity. The first network entity may measure cross-link interference (CLI) based at least in part on the measurement reference signals. The first network entity may transmit a recommendation for downlink transmit power adjustment of the second network entity, based at least in part on the CLI. The first network entity may communicate based at least in part on a response to the recommendation or a feedback rule for the recommendation. Numerous other aspects are described.