Network Privacy Management via Selective Encryption and Anonymization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network communication techniques for managing privacy are limited, complex, and inconvenient, often resulting in increased packet sizes and slower communication speeds, and many users are unaware of or unable to effectively implement privacy measures.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method that encrypts and anonymizes network communications based on user-configurable privacy rules, identifying rules based on domain names, IP addresses, website categories, ports, or protocols, and generates encrypted communications using techniques like onion routing or VPNs to enhance privacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If encryption and anonymization techniques are applied to network communications, then privacy and security are improved, but packet sizes increase and communication speeds decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy securityVSAvoidcommunication speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different privacy protection levels to different types of network communications based on their sensitivity. Instead of uniformly encrypting all traffic, it selectively applies privacy rules to specific domains, protocols, or traffic patterns, thereby protecting only what is necessary while maintaining optimal performance for non-sensitive communications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The privacy protection mechanism dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time conditions, including the type of communication, user preferences, and network state. The system can adaptively apply or bypass encryption depending on the specific communication context, allowing it to maintain privacy security while minimizing performance impact when full encryption is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If complex encryption and anonymization techniques are implemented, then privacy protection capability is improved, but system complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protection capabilityVSAvoidsystem implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a privacy rule engine as an intermediary layer between the network stack and applications. This mediator automatically evaluates communications against predefined privacy rules and applies appropriate protection measures, shielding users from the complexity of encryption algorithms and anonymization techniques while maintaining strong privacy protection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing privacy protection - allowing users to configure privacy levels, selected domains, and protection types through simple parameters rather than requiring deep understanding of cryptographic mechanisms. The complexity is encapsulated in the rule engine while presenting a simplified interface to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If users manually configure privacy protection settings, then privacy awareness and control are improved, but ease of operation and user convenience decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy controlVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors network traffic, identifies sensitive communications based on predefined rules, and applies privacy protection without requiring user intervention. The privacy rule engine self-manages the complexity of privacy configuration, automatically adapting to user needs and network conditions while maintaining strong privacy control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures privacy rules and protection mechanisms before they are needed, based on anticipated communication patterns and sensitivity requirements. This preliminary setup allows the system to automatically apply appropriate privacy protection to communications as they occur, eliminating the need for users to manually configure settings for each communication event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3311525B1Techniques for managing privacy of a network communication
Publication Date: 2020.04.08 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • EP3311525B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3311525B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3311525B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Techniques for managing privacy of a network communication may be realized as a computer-implemented system, including one or more processors that store instructions, and one or more computer processors that execute the instructions to receive a first network communication, extract information from the first network communication, identify a privacy rule based on the information, generate a second network communication based on the first network communication and the privacy rule, and cause the second network communication to be sent.