Network Regulation Server for Neutrality-Compliant Bandwidth Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network operators face capacity constraints that necessitate bandwidth management while adhering to network neutrality principles, limiting their ability to impose differential usage limits on users.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a network regulation server that manages bandwidth allocation by prioritizing communications based on user-defined access profiles, allowing users to control and adjust network usage through a user interface, while ensuring compliance with network neutrality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If network operators implement rate limits or consumption caps to manage capacity constraints, then network resource allocation is improved, but network neutrality principles are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resource allocationVSAvoidnetwork neutrality compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments network traffic into different categories based on application type, protocol, or service level. By dividing the network capacity into distinct segments, operators can apply different rate limits and consumption caps to different segments without treating all data equally, thus managing capacity while maintaining neutrality through transparent, category-based differentiation rather than arbitrary discrimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic bandwidth allocation where rate limits and consumption caps are not fixed but can be adjusted in real-time based on network conditions, user preferences, and application requirements. This dynamic approach allows operators to optimize resource allocation flexibly while complying with network neutrality by making adjustments transparent and user-driven rather than imposing static, discriminatory limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If network operators treat all data equally to comply with network neutrality, then network neutrality is maintained, but effective bandwidth management becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork neutrality complianceVSAvoidbandwidth management effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables users to self-manage their bandwidth allocation by providing interfaces where users can define their own rate limits, consumption caps, and traffic priorities. Users make decisions about how their bandwidth is allocated based on their individual needs and preferences, eliminating the need for operators to impose discriminatory limits while still achieving effective bandwidth management through user-driven policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where users receive information about their current bandwidth usage, network conditions, and available resources. This feedback enables users to make informed decisions about their traffic management preferences and adjusts their own behavior or configuration to optimize bandwidth usage while maintaining neutrality principles through transparent, user-autonomous control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If network operators impose differential usage limits on users, then individual bandwidth usage control is improved, but network neutrality requirements are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual bandwidth usage controlVSAvoidnetwork neutrality compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent allows users to pre-configure their bandwidth preferences, rate limits, and traffic priorities before network congestion occurs. Users make preliminary decisions about their bandwidth allocation based on their expected usage patterns and needs, enabling individualized control without requiring operators to impose discriminatory limits in real-time, thus maintaining neutrality while achieving personalized management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables users to dynamically adjust bandwidth parameters such as rate limits, consumption caps, and priority levels based on changing conditions. By allowing users to change these parameters autonomously rather than having operators impose them, the system achieves individualized bandwidth control while maintaining network neutrality through transparent, user-initiated parameter modifications rather than operator-imposed discrimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3982617B1Usage-based bandwidth optimization
Publication Date: 2025.10.29 GOGO BUSINESS AVIATION LLC
  • EP3982617B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3982617B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3982617B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems, graphical user interfaces, and methods are provided to optimize bandwidth usage associated with a local network. As part of the bandwidth optimization techniques, a network regulation entity may maintain a plurality of usage statistics for a plurality of electronic devices. These usage statistics may be presented by an electronic device as part of a usage summary interface. In addition to displaying the usage statistics, the usage summary interface may enable a user to modify how the network regulation entity regulates traffic. Accordingly, the network regulation entity may update an access profile in accordance with the modification. Subsequently, the traffic received from the electronic device is processed based on the user-indicated modification. Thus, compliance with network neutrality principles may be maintained.