Network Resource State Model for Physical-Logical Activity Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network management systems struggle to efficiently track and manage the inter-relationship between physical and logical activities, particularly when deploying white boxes with native operating systems, leading to unclear resource status and inefficient network operations.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive multi-stage state model that tracks physical, logical, and hybrid activities of network resources, using a three-stage state model with inventoryStatus, operationalStatus, and detailedStatus attributes to provide a unified framework for managing network resources, including sites, equipment, and connections, enhancing existing Service Provider DBORs with improved status tracking and coordination of physical, logical, and hybrid activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If a traditional network management system is used to track physical equipment, then the physical resource status can be monitored, but the inter-relationship with logical activities cannot be effectively tracked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking completeness of resource statusVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the resource status tracking into three distinct state models: physical state model (tracking physical equipment), logical state model (tracking logical resources and configurations), and hybrid state model (tracking inter-relationships between physical and logical activities). This segmentation allows comprehensive tracking without requiring a single complex system to handle all aspects simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a state model intermediary layer that sits between the physical network infrastructure and the management system. This intermediary translates and correlates physical activities with logical activities, enabling effective tracking of their inter-relationships without directly modifying the underlying complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If white boxes with native operating systems are deployed, then flexibility and adaptability improve, but the inter-relationship of physical and logical activities becomes more complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment flexibilityVSAvoidactivity coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal hybrid state model that can track and coordinate multiple types of activities (physical, logical, and their inter-relationships) across different deployment scenarios including white boxes with native operating systems. This multi-functional model handles diverse activities through a unified framework, reducing the perceived complexity despite increased adaptability requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If comprehensive tracking of physical and logical activities is implemented, then resource status clarity improves, but management efficiency may decrease due to increased complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource status clarityVSAvoidmanagement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the tracking into separate physical, logical, and hybrid state models, the patent provides comprehensive resource status clarity through structured organization. Each model handles specific aspects independently, making the information more manageable and efficient to process than a single undifferentiated tracking system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of tracking detail appropriate to each resource type and activity stage. The state models capture only the relevant attributes and relationships for each specific context, avoiding unnecessary complexity while maintaining comprehensive clarity where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250385876A1Multi-stage state model for the administration of physical, logical, and hybrid resources
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US20250385876A1 patent drawing
  • US20250385876A1 patent drawing
  • US20250385876A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, a database being maintained that has information indicating states of network resources, which can be determined based on physical activities, logical activities and hybrid activities performed on or by the network resources; obtaining activity information for a particular network resource, where the activity information is a physical activity, a logical activity and/or a hybrid activity; and determining whether a state change for the particular network resource should be made such as to whether the activity information corresponds to and warrants change to at least one of an inventory state, an operational state, or a detailed state. Other embodiments are disclosed.