Network Device Categorization Using Response Header Embeddings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for network device categorization are complex, resource-intensive, and struggle with scalability and accuracy due to reliance on deep packet inspection and static signature databases, which are inefficient and prone to obfuscation.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing machine learning models to generate vector embeddings from network device response data, specifically focusing on status codes and headers, enabling efficient and adaptive device categorization without deep packet inspection, and employing clustering techniques to group similar devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If deep packet inspection is used to analyze network device contents, then device categorization accuracy is improved, but processing power requirements and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice categorization accuracyVSAvoidprocessing power
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential identifying features from network device responses - specifically response headers and status codes - rather than analyzing the entire packet content. This extraction approach maintains categorization accuracy while dramatically reducing processing power requirements and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the device identification process into distinct components: extracting response headers, generating vector embeddings from these headers, and comparing embeddings to known device profiles. This segmentation allows for efficient processing of only the most relevant data portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If deep packet inspection is used to analyze network device contents, then device categorization accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice categorization accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential identifying features from network device responses - specifically response headers and status codes - rather than analyzing the entire packet content. This extraction approach maintains categorization accuracy while dramatically reducing processing power requirements and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary extraction of response headers and generation of vector embeddings before the actual categorization comparison. This preliminary action prepares the data in advance in an optimized format, reducing the time required for the final categorization step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If static databases of device signatures are used for device identification, then device categorization is simplified, but the databases become outdated quickly as new devices enter the market

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization method complexityVSAvoiddevice database currency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic device identification system where vector embeddings of new devices are continuously added to the database. The system naturally adapts to new device types through embedding comparison, allowing the database to evolve without manual updates while maintaining simple categorization logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If MAC addresses or device IDs are analyzed for device identification, then device categorization is quick and simple, but these identifiers can be spoofed or obfuscated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification speedVSAvoididentification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying on directly observable but spoofable identifiers like MAC addresses, the patent creates a functional copy of device identity through vector embeddings generated from response headers. These embeddings capture the device's actual behavioral characteristics, making spoofing difficult while maintaining quick identification speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20260050637A1Method and apparatus for determining a device category of a network device
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 MODAT BV
  • US20260050637A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050637A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050637A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method for identifying a device category of a network device. The method includes sending an HTTP and/or HTTPS request (41) to the network device, receiving a response (43) from the network device including response data consisting of a response status code and response headers (44), generating a vector embedding (45) from the response data (51) using a machine learning model, and identifying a device category (48) based on the vector embedding and further vector embeddings in a first data set (47). The identifying comprises identifying a cluster of network devices (46) in the first data set based on the vector embedding, and retrieving a device category of the identified cluster as the device category of the network device.