Network Security Rating Framework for Automated Compliance Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network and security teams face challenges in monitoring and comparing the security posture of enterprise networks due to complex and rapidly changing configurations, lack of automated compliance assessment, and inability to interpret industry standards, leading to potential errors and inefficiencies in risk management.

Innovation Solution

A security rating framework that translates compliance requirements into technical configurations, allowing continuous monitoring and generation of security ratings for network elements through a security fabric, enabling automated validation and reporting, and providing comparative analysis across peers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual compliance assessment is performed by extracting and comparing device configurations against standards, then compliance verification can be achieved, but the process requires expert knowledge, is time-consuming, and cannot be scaled to assess all network elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance verification accuracyVSAvoidtime required for compliance assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network security device performs self-assessment of its own configuration compliance by automatically comparing its configuration data against compliance requirements, eliminating the need for manual expert review while maintaining verification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A compliance assessment module acts as an intermediary between the network security device and compliance standards, automatically interpreting and applying compliance requirements to device configurations, thereby reducing both time and expert knowledge requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If comprehensive security assessment of all network elements is conducted manually, then complete security posture visibility can be achieved, but the complexity and resource requirements become unmanageable for enterprises with multiple network elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity posture visibilityVSAvoidcomplexity of compliance assessment process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance assessment module is designed with universal functionality to assess multiple types of network elements against various compliance standards simultaneously, providing comprehensive security posture visibility through a single integrated system rather than separate manual assessments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated compliance assessment module serves as an intermediary that simplifies the complex process of evaluating network elements against compliance standards by encapsulating the complexity within the module while presenting simplified results to users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If frequent updates to security configurations and policies are made to meet evolving business needs, then adaptability to new threats and requirements improves, but maintaining compliance becomes more challenging and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to new security requirementsVSAvoidcompliance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous feedback by automatically monitoring configuration changes and assessing compliance in real-time, alerting administrators to compliance issues as they arise, thereby maintaining compliance consistency even as configurations evolve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance assessment module performs preliminary validation of configuration changes before they are fully deployed, ensuring that compliance requirements are met proactively rather than reactively, thus maintaining reliability during frequent updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If enterprise customers attempt to assess individual network elements for compliance, then some compliance information can be obtained, but the process lacks automation, requires repeated manual effort for each element, and provides no comparative context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance information completenessVSAvoidcompliance assessment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance assessment module provides universal assessment capabilities that can evaluate any network element against any compliance standard through a single automated process, eliminating the need for repeated manual assessments and providing comprehensive compliance information across the entire network

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated compliance assessment module acts as an intermediary that collects, processes, and presents compliance information from multiple network elements in a unified manner, improving productivity by automating data collection and providing comparative context through centralized reporting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11770403B2Determination of a security rating of a network element
Publication Date: 2023.09.26 FORTINET INC
  • US11770403B2 patent drawing
  • US11770403B2 patent drawing
  • US11770403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for a security rating framework that translates compliance requirements to corresponding desired technical configurations to facilitate generation of security ratings for network elements is provided. According to one embodiment, a host network element executes a collection of security checks on at least a first network element. The execution is performed by receiving configuration data of the first network element pertaining to each security check of the collection of security checks in response to a request by the host network element and validating each security check by comparing the received configuration data pertaining to each security check with a pre-defined or configurable network security configuration recommendation to generate a compliance result. Further, the host network element generates a compliance report by aggregating the compliance results obtained by executing each security check of the collection of security checks.