Network Security System with Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Traffic Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security systems face challenges in automatically and dynamically adjusting the scope of traffic subject to inspection, particularly when certain applications are incompatible with network security gateways or when sensitive data is involved.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a network security system with a feedback loop that dynamically adjusts the scope of traffic inspection based on threat intelligence, logs analysis, and machine learning algorithms to identify domains that should be exempt from inspection or require special handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If network security gateways perform deep packet inspection and proxy all traffic, then security threat detection capability is improved, but application compatibility deteriorates and traffic inspection accuracy worsens due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity threat detection capabilityVSAvoidapplication compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different inspection policies to different domains based on their characteristics. Domains are classified into categories (e.g., high-risk, low-risk, sensitive) and receive tailored inspection treatments. This allows deep inspection for suspicious domains while bypassing inspection for compatible applications and sensitive data domains, resolving the contradiction between security detection and application compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection policy is dynamically adjusted based on feedback from the environment. The system continuously monitors application compatibility issues and security threats, then automatically updates domain classification and inspection rules. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to maintain high security detection while minimizing false positives and maintaining application compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual analysis of error logs is used to adjust inspection scope, then application compatibility is improved, but productivity deteriorates and inspection accuracy worsens due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication compatibilityVSAvoidinspection adjustment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors its own operation, collects feedback on inspection outcomes and application compatibility issues, and self-adjusts inspection policies without human intervention. The automated feedback loop analyzes error logs, identifies patterns, and modifies domain classification rules, eliminating the need for manual analysis while improving both productivity and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where inspection results, application compatibility data, and security threat information are continuously collected and analyzed. This feedback drives automatic policy adjustments, enabling rapid response to new threats and compatibility issues without manual intervention, thus improving both productivity and inspection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If all traffic is inspected to ensure security, then security coverage is improved, but loss of time increases due to manual log analysis and policy adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidpolicy adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of domains into risk categories before inspection based on known threat intelligence and domain characteristics. High-risk domains are pre-identified for detailed inspection, while low-risk and sensitive domains are pre-marked for bypass. This preliminary action reduces the need for time-consuming manual policy adjustments and enables faster security response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated feedback loop continuously monitors security threats and application compatibility, automatically updating inspection policies in real-time. This self-service capability eliminates delays associated with manual log analysis and policy adjustment, maintaining comprehensive security coverage while minimizing time loss through automated, real-time adaptations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12289293B2Network security analysis system with reinforcement learning for selecting domains to scan
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12289293B2 patent drawing
  • US12289293B2 patent drawing
  • US12289293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document describes among other things, network security systems that incorporate a feedback loop so as to automatically and dynamically adjust the scope of network traffic that is subject to inspection. Risky traffic can be sent for inspection; risky traffic that is demonstrated to have high rate of threats can be outright blocked without further inspection; traffic that is causing errors due to protocol incompatibility or should not be inspected for regulatory or other reasons can be flagged so it bypasses the security inspection system. The system can operate on a domain by domain basis, IP address basis, or otherwise.