Centralized Network Segmentation for Data-Based Security Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security solutions are ineffective in dynamically adapting to the changing nature of devices within a network, lacking flexibility and failing to proactively mitigate data-based security risks, especially in large and medium organizations, due to manual reconfiguration and the inability to handle dynamic changes in device criticality and hardware/software updates.

Innovation Solution

A network monitor entity scans the network to assess security risks based on data sensitivity and vulnerability, dynamically segmenting the network and adjusting access policies through enforcement points to isolate or reduce access to risky devices, using a centralized approach that adapts to changes in software, hardware, and data configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual reconfiguration is used to adapt network security, then security policies can be adjusted, but the system cannot dynamically respond to changing device criticality and hardware/software updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adaptation to device changesVSAvoidmanual reconfiguration requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and assessing device security risks in advance, maintaining an updated risk assessment database that evaluates device criticality, hardware/software configurations, and security postures before incidents occur, enabling proactive rather than reactive security management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic network segmentation that automatically adjusts segment assignments and access policies in real-time based on changing device risk assessments, allowing the network topology to adapt dynamically to device changes, updates, and criticality variations without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If DLP software is installed on devices to enhance security, then data protection is improved, but devices become overburdened with restrictive software

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity risk mitigationVSAvoiddevice software burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the security enforcement function from individual devices and relocates it to a centralized cloud-based platform. The risk assessment database and segmentation logic reside externally, allowing devices to be monitored and controlled without installing heavy DLP software locally, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining security reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a centralized network monitor entity as an intermediary between security policies and devices. This mediator assesses device risks, determines appropriate segmentation levels, and enforces access policies without requiring direct software installation on monitored devices, reducing their software burden while maintaining security control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If network segmentation is implemented to isolate risky devices, then security risks are reduced, but network access flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity risk exposureVSAvoidnetwork access flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic network segmentation where segment assignments and access policies automatically adjust based on real-time device risk assessments. Devices can move between security segments as their risk profiles change, maintaining access flexibility for low-risk devices while automatically isolating high-risk devices, thus balancing security risk reduction with network access versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies differentiated access policies to different network segments based on local risk characteristics. Each segment receives security controls tailored to its specific risk level and device criticality, allowing high-security zones for sensitive devices while maintaining open access for low-risk devices, thereby reducing overall security risk exposure while preserving necessary network access flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4454218B1Centralized network response to mitigate a data-based security risk
Publication Date: 2026.02.04 FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP4454218B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4454218B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4454218B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems, methods, and related technologies for identifying and reducing security risks on a network are described. Data that is held on each of one or more devices that are connected to a network is determined. A security risk of each of the one or more devices is determined based at least on the data. In response to the security risk of one of the one or more devices satisfying a threshold, the network is segmented such that the one of the one or more devices is placed on a less accessible segment of the network which reduces the security risk of the one of the one or more devices.