Network Device Site Detection Using Beacon Transmission Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inventory systems for network devices require manual geo-location updates, are time-consuming, prone to human error, and lack automation for network topology changes, with inaccuracies up to 500 km or more, making them insufficient for accurate inventory management in multi-site networks.

Innovation Solution

A system using unsupervised and supervised machine learning to predict network device locations by analyzing packet transmission characteristics, such as latency and hop counts, without GPS, through clustering techniques and machine learning models trained on known beacon devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual geolocation methods are used, then device location information can be obtained, but the process is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeolocation accuracyVSAvoidtime for manual geolocation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical geolocation processes with an automated machine learning system. The system uses packet transmission characteristics and latency measurements to automatically determine device locations, substituting human operators with computational algorithms that process network data to predict geographic positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The inventory system performs self-updating through automated machine learning processes. The system continuously monitors packet transmission characteristics and automatically updates device location information without requiring external manual intervention, enabling the system to maintain itself autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual inventory updates are performed, then device location changes can be tracked, but human errors occur and updates are prone to inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory accuracyVSAvoidmanual update complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual inventory update processes with automated machine learning algorithms. These algorithms analyze packet transmission characteristics and automatically update device location information, eliminating human error-prone data entry and manual tracking processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors packet transmission characteristics and uses this feedback to automatically detect and respond to device location changes. The machine learning model processes ongoing network data streams to identify when devices move and updates inventory information accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that self-corrects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If conventional geo-location algorithms are used, then location estimation can be performed, but accuracy is insufficient with errors up to 500 km

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation detection speedVSAvoidgeo-location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used for location determination from conventional GPS coordinates to packet transmission characteristics including latency, packet loss, and network hop counts. By measuring multiple transmission parameters between devices and comparing them against known beacon locations, the system achieves accurate site identification without relying on traditional geolocation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional GPS coordinate-based location to a multi-dimensional approach using packet transmission characteristics. The system analyzes latency, packet loss, hop count, and other network parameters to determine location, adding multiple measurement dimensions that improve accuracy over conventional single-point GPS methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If automated machine learning processes are used, then geolocation prediction is accurate and fast, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice location prediction speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-collecting packet transmission characteristics and pre-training machine learning models with known device locations. This preparation work is done in advance so that when location prediction is needed, the system can quickly process new data using pre-established patterns and models, reducing real-time computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces beacon devices as intermediaries to simplify the location determination process. These known-location devices serve as reference points that mediate between unknown devices and the central system, enabling the machine learning model to predict locations through comparative analysis rather than direct complex calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12634201B2Detecting site locations of unknown network devices
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 CIENA CORP
  • US12634201B2 patent drawing
  • US12634201B2 patent drawing
  • US12634201B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for predicting the location of unknown network devices within a particular site of a multi-site network are provided. A method, according to one implementation, includes obtaining transmission characteristics related to any of packets and frames transmitted between an unknown network device and a plurality of beacon devices. Each beacon device is a network device associated with a fixed site location within a multi-site network. The method also includes utilizing the transmission characteristics to predict a site within the multi-site network where the unknown network device is located.