Network Threat Prediction via Dynamic Block List Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security systems are ineffective against rapidly changing and stealthy cyber threats due to their reliance on blocking known threats, which quickly become outdated.

Innovation Solution

A system that predicts network threats by identifying threat vectors, determining related threats through reputation and relationship analysis, and updating firewall block lists to proactively block malicious network activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If network security systems rely on blocking known threats, then they can effectively block identified threats, but they become quickly outdated and ineffective against rapidly changing stealth attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness against known threatsVSAvoidability to handle evolving threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively identifying and blocking threat vectors before they can execute malicious activities. The firewall analyzes network activity logs to detect potential threats and adds them to block lists in advance, preventing both known and emerging threats from compromising the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic threat blocking by continuously monitoring network activity and updating block lists in real-time. The firewall adapts to changing threats by dynamically identifying new threat vectors and adjusting blocking rules, ensuring effectiveness against both known and evolving threats without relying on static signatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the system blocks all potentially threatening network events using a block list, then network security is enhanced, but false positives may block legitimate network activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork security protectionVSAvoidlegitimate network access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by implementing granular, context-specific blocking rules rather than broad blanket bans. The firewall analyzes specific threat vectors and their relationships to determine precise blocking requirements, allowing legitimate network activity to proceed while blocking only the specific malicious elements identified through reputation and relationship analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system analyzes network activity logs to identify threat vectors and related threats, then threat prediction accuracy improves, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses on specific key indicators from network activity logs to identify threat vectors. Rather than analyzing all network traffic in detail, the firewall extracts relevant threat indicators and their relationships, reducing processing complexity while maintaining high threat identification accuracy through targeted analysis of reputation and relationship data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250211569A1Network Threat Prediction and Blocking
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US20250211569A1 patent drawing
  • US20250211569A1 patent drawing
  • US20250211569A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A firewall monitors network activity and stores information about that network activity in a network activity log. The network activity is analyzed to identify a potential threat. The potential threat is further analyzed to identify other potential threats that are related to the potential threat, and are likely to pose a future risk to a protected network. A block list is updated to include the potential threat and the other potential threats to protect the protected network from the potential threat and the other potential threats.