Network Traffic Anomaly Detection for Fraud Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic and Internet-connected devices are inadequately protected against fraudulent and malicious activities, with conventional anti-virus or anti-malware software failing to provide complete protection, leading to risks such as identity theft, unauthorized access, and other harmful activities.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a Data Collector and Mediator Unit, a Predictor Unit with Machine Learning capabilities, and a fraud and malicious activity mitigation unit, which monitors network traffic, detects anomalies, and triggers mitigation operations to classify and address fraudulent or malicious activities, using features extraction and classification of traffic patterns and user behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional anti-virus or anti-malware software is used, then basic protection is provided, but protection against fraudulent and malicious activities is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct functional modules: Data Collector and Mediator Unit for monitoring network traffic, Predictor Unit with Features Extractor and Machine Learning unit for analysis, and fraud and malicious activity mitigation unit for response actions. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall detection reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The Data Collector and Mediator Unit acts as an intermediary between network traffic and the analysis system. It monitors and collects traffic data before passing it to the Predictor Unit, enabling comprehensive protection without requiring direct integration of complex detection logic into every device, thus balancing protection effectiveness with system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If Machine Learning analysis is applied to detect anomalies, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The Features Extractor unit performs preliminary processing by extracting relevant features from raw network traffic data before passing them to the Machine Learning unit. This pre-processing step reduces the dimensionality and complexity of the input data, enabling faster and more efficient anomaly detection while maintaining high accuracy through focused feature analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the most relevant features from network traffic data using the Features Extractor unit, rather than analyzing complete raw data. This extraction of essential characteristics maintains detection accuracy while significantly reducing computational burden and processing time required by the Machine Learning model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If comprehensive mitigation operations are triggered, then protection coverage is enhanced, but system performance and user experience may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection coverageVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud and malicious activity mitigation unit applies mitigation operations selectively based on the specific anomalies detected by the Machine Learning unit. Rather than implementing blanket restrictions across all traffic, the system targets only the identified fraudulent or malicious activities with appropriate mitigation actions, maintaining comprehensive protection coverage while minimizing impact on legitimate system performance and user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11943245B2System, device, and method of protecting electronic devices against fraudulent and malicious activities
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 ALLOT COMM LTD
  • US11943245B2 patent drawing
  • US11943245B2 patent drawing
  • US11943245B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods of protecting electronic or Internet-connected devices against fraudulent and malicious activities. A Data Collector and Mediator Unit monitors network traffic, and generates datasets of network traffic; each dataset includes network traffic monitored within a time-slot having a particular fixed time-length. A Predictor Unit includes a Features Extractor, to extract features from the datasets; and a Machine Learning (ML) unit, to run the extracted features through a ML model and to classify a particular traffic-portion as being either (I) an anomalous traffic-portion that is associated with fraudulent or malicious activity, or (II) a non-anomalous traffic-portion that is not-associated with fraudulent or malicious activity. The ML unit operates on both (i) anomalies in traffic patterns, and (ii) anomalies of user behavior and/or device behavior. A fraud and malicious activity mitigation unit activates mitigation operations for traffic-portions that were classified anomalous traffic-portions associated with fraudulent or malicious activity.