Network Traffic Prefiltering for Malicious Activity Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in effectively detecting and preventing malware attacks, as malware authors continually adapt their techniques, making it difficult for traditional security measures to keep pace.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a data appliance with advanced logical components, including a firewall, network processor, application identification engine, and threat engine, which works in conjunction with a security platform to analyze samples and detect malicious activities through multi-stage detection processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional security measures are used to detect and prevent malware, then implementation is simpler and faster, but detection accuracy decreases and false positives increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system is divided into multiple specialized components: network processor for packet processing, application identification engine for protocol analysis, threat engine for malware detection, and firewall for access control. Each component handles specific security tasks independently, improving overall detection accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-layer signature-based detection to multi-dimensional analysis by incorporating application-layer inspection, behavioral analysis, and multi-stage detection processes. This adds new dimensions of security analysis that significantly improve detection accuracy for sophisticated attacks without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If advanced multi-stage detection processes are implemented, then detection accuracy improves, but processing latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering and analysis in early stages before full multi-stage detection is activated. Routine traffic is handled by faster signature-based detection, while only suspicious traffic progresses to more intensive multi-stage analysis. This preliminary triage reduces overall processing latency while maintaining high detection accuracy for actual threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-stage detection process is applied selectively rather than uniformly to all traffic. The system performs partial detection on low-risk traffic and excessive (full) detection only on high-risk suspicious traffic. This approach maintains high detection accuracy for threats while minimizing latency impact on overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Speed

If real-time analysis is performed on all traffic, then emerging threats are detected faster, but system resources are overwhelmed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection speedVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Different levels of analysis intensity are applied to different traffic segments based on their risk characteristics. High-risk traffic receives intensive real-time analysis with full resource allocation, while low-risk traffic receives lighter processing. This localized quality approach enables fast threat detection for critical traffic without overwhelming system resources with uniform high-intensity processing of all traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs automated triage mechanisms that self-adjust resource allocation based on traffic patterns and threat levels. The threat engine automatically identifies and prioritizes suspicious traffic for intensive analysis without manual intervention, enabling the system to maintain fast response to emerging threats while dynamically managing resource consumption to prevent overload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250047695A1Advanced threat prevention
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC
  • US20250047695A1 patent drawing
  • US20250047695A1 patent drawing
  • US20250047695A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Network traffic (e.g., as monitored by a security appliance on a local network) associated with a session is parsed to determine, using a prefilter, that a suspicious portion of that traffic should be forwarded to a remote service. The remote service is configured with a plurality of realtime detectors. A verdict is received from the remote service. In the event the verdict indicates that the session is malicious, a remedial action is taken in response.