Networked Door Operator Centralized Control System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing door operator systems only respond to commands provided by local or remote users, lacking the ability to adjust or control door status based on centralized or distributed control systems, environmental variances, or sensor data.

Innovation Solution

A door operator system that communicates with a central control device, distributed control devices, other door operators, or the cloud, incorporating intelligence and learning capabilities to adjust door statuses based on schedules, operational variances, and sensor data, including a locking feature to control door positions and prevent opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If door operators respond only to local or remote user commands, then the system is simple to operate, but the system lacks adaptability to environmental variances and centralized control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to environmental variancesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door operator system incorporates sensors that detect environmental conditions (such as temperature, humidity, air quality) and feed this information back to the controller. The controller automatically adjusts door operation parameters based on sensor feedback, enabling adaptability to environmental variances without requiring complex manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The door operator system performs self-adjustment based on pre-programmed schedules and sensor data. The controller autonomously determines when doors should open or close, how long they should remain open, and at what speed, without requiring continuous user input. This self-service capability provides adaptability while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If multiple door operators are controlled by separate local systems, then each door operates independently, but the system lacks centralized coordination and optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor operation efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple door operator controls into a single centralized controller that manages all door operators within the facility. This unified control system coordinates door operations across multiple entrances and exits, optimizing overall door operation efficiency while maintaining individual door independence through modular communication protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized controller serves multiple functions: it controls all door operators, monitors environmental sensors, manages access credentials, and coordinates with security systems. This multi-functional approach improves overall system productivity by eliminating the need for separate control systems for each door while managing complexity through integrated design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If door operators lack learning capabilities, then the system is easier to manufacture, but the system cannot optimize operations based on usage patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational optimizationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The door operator system incorporates sensors that detect usage patterns (frequency of door opening, time of day, duration of door open state) and feed this data back to the controller. The controller analyzes this feedback and automatically optimizes operational parameters such as door hold-open duration, closing speed, and scheduling, enabling productivity improvement through data-driven decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-programs multiple operational profiles and schedules that can be automatically selected based on detected usage patterns. Rather than requiring complex real-time calculations, the controller chooses from pre-prepared optimization strategies, balancing manufacturing simplicity with operational intelligence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10559151B2Networked door closer and auto-operator
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 SCHLAGE LOCK CO LLC
  • US10559151B2 patent drawing
  • US10559151B2 patent drawing
  • US10559151B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An access control system for a plurality of door operators that are each respectively coupled to one of a plurality of doors providing an entrance to or exit from a building. A system controller monitors the status of each of the doors real time and controls the operation of each of the door operators based on the monitored status. The system controller adjusts the status of one or more door operators as a function of the determined status of one or more other door operators. Door operator commands are provided by the system controller to selected door operators to, for example, extend the opening time of one or more doors due to current activity by other door closers. The system controller is configured adjust the status of an entire group of doors or a sub-group group of doors depending on the status of the door operators.