Networked Hazard Detectors Monitoring Readiness via Broadcasts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Portable fire extinguisher cylinders in buildings often go unserviced, leading to reduced readiness and availability during emergencies due to missed maintenance schedules, resulting in potential unavailability during fire incidents.

Innovation Solution

An interactive network of hazard detectors and fire extinguishers that monitor signal strength and periodic broadcasts to identify and alert on maintenance needs and readiness, using a system panel to visually and audibly indicate alert conditions and maintenance requirements across the network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fire extinguishers are installed at specified locations throughout a building, then accessibility during emergencies is improved, but reliability deteriorates when utility service providers fail to adhere to service and maintenance schedules

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidreadiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a networked monitoring system where fire extinguishers continuously broadcast their status (pressure, temperature, maintenance history) and receive acknowledgments from monitoring devices. This feedback loop enables real-time tracking of extinguisher readiness, alerting facility managers when servicing is needed, thus maintaining reliability without compromising accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The fire extinguishers autonomously monitor their own status parameters (pressure, temperature, usage history) and self-report to the network without requiring manual inspection. This self-service capability ensures continuous readiness monitoring while reducing dependency on human operators to maintain reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If fire extinguishers are serviced and maintained at regular intervals, then readiness is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to removal from service during maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereadinessVSAvoidavailability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system detects readiness degradation trends (pressure drops, temperature changes) before they result in complete failure. By providing advance warning, the system enables scheduling of maintenance during planned downtime rather than unexpected failures, minimizing disruption to productivity while maintaining readiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts maintenance scheduling based on actual usage patterns and condition monitoring data. Extinguishers are serviced based on their actual wear and usage rather than fixed intervals, optimizing the balance between maintaining readiness and minimizing removal from service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If fire extinguishers are monitored continuously for readiness, then reliability is improved, but use of energy increases due to continuous monitoring and broadcasting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadiness monitoringVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Fire extinguishers broadcast their status at periodic intervals rather than continuously, and monitoring devices check status at scheduled intervals. This periodic monitoring approach maintains reliability by detecting readiness changes over time while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring frequency and broadcast intervals are dynamically adjusted based on extinguisher conditions. When parameters are stable, monitoring occurs at lower frequency to conserve energy. When parameters indicate potential issues, monitoring intensity increases to maintain reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If signal strength thresholds are set low to detect all extinguishers, then measurement precision is improved, but false alerts increase due to ambient interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alerts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary baseline measurements of signal strength and ambient interference levels during installation and normal operation. These baselines are stored and used to distinguish between normal variations and actual alerts, improving detection sensitivity while reducing false alerts caused by ambient interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Signal strength thresholds are dynamically adjusted based on environmental conditions, time of day, and historical data. The system learns normal signal patterns and adapts thresholds accordingly, maintaining high detection sensitivity while filtering out false alerts from ambient interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3892018B1Networked hazard detectors which monitor for readiness and availability
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 CARRIER CORP
  • EP3892018B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3892018B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3892018B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

Disclosed is a system that includes a first device of a plurality of devices operatively connected over a network for responding to a detected hazard, wherein the first device: monitors the network for self-identifying broadcasts the plurality of devices, and when the first device receives over the network self-identifying broadcasts from a second device, the first device retransmits the self-identifying broadcasts into the network.