Networked Security Systems Intruder Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional security systems are self-contained and only alert property owners of intrusions at their own properties, failing to provide warnings for potential threats from neighboring properties, and they lack the ability to track intruders after they leave the property, making it difficult for law enforcement to apprehend perpetrators.

Innovation Solution

The integration of security systems across multiple properties in a network, where A/V recording and communication devices share intrusion data to alert users at other properties, analyze threat proximity and level, and link with public security systems to track suspects through publicly-accessible cameras.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If security systems are made self-contained and independent, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the ability to provide regional security coverage and track intruders across properties is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidregional security coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent security systems into a networked geographic security system where devices at different properties communicate with each other. The system merges individual property security functions with regional coordination capabilities, allowing intruder tracking across multiple properties while maintaining the operational simplicity of individual devices through automated network protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If security systems share data and communicate across multiple properties, then regional security coverage and intruder tracking capability are improved, but device complexity and information loss are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregional security coverageVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a communication network and data sharing protocol as an intermediary layer between individual security systems. This mediator handles the complexity of inter-property communication, data synchronization, and coordinate sharing, allowing individual devices to remain relatively simple while achieving complex regional security coverage through the mediating network infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If security systems alert only local property owners, then information loss is minimized and ease of operation is maintained, but the ability to provide preventive warnings to neighboring properties is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation lossVSAvoidpreventive warning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments security information dissemination into different levels: local property alerts and regional preventive warnings. The system divides the alert propagation into controlled segments where intrusion data is selectively shared with neighboring properties based on proximity and threat level, preventing information overload while maintaining preventive warning capabilities through structured information distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12063458B1Synchronizing security systems in a geographic network
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12063458B1 patent drawing
  • US12063458B1 patent drawing
  • US12063458B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The application is directed to techniques and processes for integrating multiple security systems. For instance, a system may receive first data from a first security system, where the first data indicates that the first security system detected a security event. The system may then analyze the first data to determine a type of the security event, a time frame of the security event, and/or a threat level of the security event. Based at least in part on the analyzing, the system may determine a security procedure for a second security system. The second security system may be located proximate to the first security system and/or may be included in a same security system network as the first security system. The security procedure may include changing a mode of the second security system and/or causing an electronic device of the second security system to generate image data.