Networked Valve Controller for Dynamic Addressing and Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing water conditioning systems lack efficient communication and coordination between valve controllers, leading to suboptimal operation and user interface limitations, such as restricted access to system parameters and lack of dynamic addressing, which affects the overall management and monitoring of water treatment processes.

Innovation Solution

A valve controller with a microcontroller that enables communication with other valve controllers, user interface for input and error logging, dynamic addressing, and network coordination, allowing for improved system parameter management, error logging, and automatic master unit selection, enhancing the operational efficiency and user accessibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If valve controllers operate independently without network communication, then device complexity is reduced, but system coordination and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coordination efficiencyVSAvoidcontroller network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple valve controllers are merged into a coordinated network system where they communicate and share information. The controllers work together as a unified system rather than isolated units, enabling centralized parameter management and improved system-wide coordination while maintaining individual controller functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The valve controllers are designed with multi-functionality, serving both as individual unit controllers and as networked system nodes. Each controller can operate autonomously while also participating in network communication, parameter synchronization, and coordinated system operation, maximizing utility without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If system parameters are accessible without restrictions, then ease of operation is improved, but system reliability and user setting protection deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter access easeVSAvoiduser setting protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The parameter access system implements dynamic permission levels that adapt based on user needs and system state. Different users or operational modes can have different levels of access to system parameters, allowing easy access for routine operations while protecting critical settings from unauthorized changes, thus balancing usability with reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If manual addressing of valve controllers is used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation and system setup time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller addressing easeVSAvoidautomatic addressing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve controllers implement self-addressing capability where each controller automatically assigns itself an address within the network without requiring manual configuration. This self-service functionality simplifies system setup and eliminates addressing errors while the underlying addressing logic remains integrated within the controller firmware, minimizing additional external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of information

If each valve controller is configured independently, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of information and system parameter consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter consistencyVSAvoidnetwork communication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve controller network implements feedback mechanisms where controllers exchange parameter information and configuration data with each other. This feedback loop ensures that all controllers maintain consistent system parameters and settings, preventing information loss and ensuring uniform operation across the distributed system while the communication protocol remains integrated within the network architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11994035B2Valve controller system and method
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 PENTAIR RESIDENTIAL FILTRATION LLC
  • US11994035B2 patent drawing
  • US11994035B2 patent drawing
  • US11994035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention provide a valve controller configured to network with one or more other valve controllers in a water condition system, providing on-board communication between valves. The valve controller can provide, among other features, improved demand recall, user settings protection, dynamic addressing and automatic master unit selection, network settings push capabilities, and/or descriptive error log displays.